Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan
Published on: August 27, 2019
Recognition of clinical characteristics for population-based surveillance of fetal alcohol syndrome
Jennifer G Andrews1, Maureen K Galindo1, F John Meaney1
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Insights
Specialist physicians report more fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) characteristics than other providers, improving public health surveillance. Better documentation of FAS features is crucial for accurate data collection and communication.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Genetics
Background:
- Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) diagnosis relies on specific facial, growth, and central nervous system (CNS) features.
- Public health surveillance of FAS necessitates thorough documentation of these diagnostic characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if the type of healthcare provider influences the reporting of FAS characteristics.
- To assess the association between provider type and documentation of FAS diagnostic features.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 345 cases aged 7-9 years from the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Surveillance Network II (FASSNetII).
- Inclusion of cases with recorded provider type (specialist vs. other) and reported FAS characteristics (facial, CNS, growth).
Main Results:
- Specialist physicians reported more FAS characteristics (average >6) compared to other providers (average <5).
- Specialists more frequently reported facial characteristics and developmental delay.
- Specialists documented all three FAS domains (facial, CNS, growth) in 97% of cases, versus two-thirds by other providers.
Conclusions:
- Current medical record documentation for FAS evaluations is suboptimal for effective communication and surveillance.
- Inconsistent documentation by providers limits the quality and quantity of data for public health surveillance systems.
Background:
The diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) rests on identification of characteristic facial, growth, and central nervous system (CNS) features. Public health surveillance of FAS depends on documentation of these characteristics. We evaluated if reporting of FAS characteristics is associated with the type of provider examining the child.
Methods:
We analyzed cases aged 7-9 years from the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Surveillance Network II (FASSNetII). We included cases whose surveillance records included the type of provider (qualifying provider: developmental pediatrician, geneticist, neonatologist; other physician; or other provider) who evaluated the child as well as the FAS diagnostic characteristics (facial dysmorphology, CNS impairment, and/or growth deficiency) reported by the provider.
Results:
A total of 345 cases were eligible for this analysis. Of these, 188 (54.5%) had adequate information on type of provider. Qualifying physicians averaged more than six reported FAS characteristics while other providers averaged less than five. Qualifying physicians reported on facial characteristics and developmental delay more frequently than other providers. Also, qualifying physicians reported on all three domains of characteristics (facial, CNS, and growth) in 97% of cases while others reported all three characteristics on two thirds of cases.
Conclusions:
Documentation in medical records during clinical evaluations for FAS is lower than optimal for cross-provider communication and surveillance purposes. Lack of documentation limits the quality and quantity of information in records that serve as a major source of data for public health surveillance systems.
More Related Videos
10:07Assessing Teratogenic Changes in a Zebrafish Model of Fetal Alcohol Exposure
Published on: March 20, 2012
09:39Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Turner Syndrome 45XO Fetal Cells for Downstream Modelling of Neurological Deficits Associated with the Syndrome
Published on: December 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Characteristics of Life
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Population Genetics?