Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

48.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.4K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

33.1K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
33.1K
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

6.3K
Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
6.3K
Eukaryotic Evolution01:24

Eukaryotic Evolution

42.5K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
42.5K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.8K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K
Velocity of an Object01:18

Velocity of an Object

213
Understanding how an object moves along a path requires distinguishing between motion over a time span and motion at a precise moment. A useful example is a vehicle traveling along a straight and level path, where its position at any given time is known. The initial step in analyzing this motion is to measure how far the vehicle travels over a fixed time period. This measurement, called average velocity, is computed by dividing the total change in position by the duration over which the change...
213

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leonard T. Furlow, MD.

Annals of plastic surgery·2024
Same author

Practice Trends in Plastic Hand Surgery: An Evaluation of Cases in the TOPS Database.

Journal of hand and microsurgery·2024
Same author

Axial-Radial-Ulnar Carpal Dislocation with Divergent Intermetacarpal Dislocations, Peritrapezoid and Scaphotrapezial Dislocations: A Case Report.

The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume·2024
Same author

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2023
Same author

Commentary: Risk of Complications in Combined Plastic Surgery Procedures Using the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons Database.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2023
Same author

Safety of Outpatient Plastic Surgery: A Comparative Analysis Using the TOPS Registry with 286,826 Procedures.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2023
Same journal

The Rise of Nerve Transfers: Tracing a National Evolution Toward the Postgrafting Era in Brachial Plexus Injury Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Response to: The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Review of Pressure Sores: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Surgical Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Venous Flow-Through Flaps in Hand Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Experimental Rat Peripheral Nerve Models: Surgical Exposures and Applications.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.3K

Facelift Practice Evolution: Objective Implementation of New Surgical Techniques.

Patrick J Buchanan1, Danielle C Mihora, Bruce A Mast

  • 1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|January 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) facelift is effective for younger patients with less neck laxity, offering shorter operative times. However, traditional facelifts may be better for significant skin laxity and neck concerns.

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K
Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring
11:17

Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring

Published on: April 3, 2015

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.3K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K
Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring
11:17

Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring

Published on: April 3, 2015

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Facial Rejuvenation Techniques

Background:

  • Traditional facelifts involve superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication or flap.
  • The minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) facelift offers a less invasive alternative.
  • The senior author transitioned from traditional to predominantly MACS facelift procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of the MACS facelift technique versus the traditional facelift approach.
  • To objectively incorporate study findings into clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of facelifts performed between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015.
  • Comparison with a historical cohort of prior facelift procedures.
  • Recorded parameters included demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, complications, revision surgery, and surgeon satisfaction.

Main Results:

  • The MACS technique was used on younger patients and had significantly shorter operative times and mean follow-up compared to traditional facelifts.
  • MACS facelifts allowed for concurrent non-facial procedures.
  • Postoperative neck laxity, submental, and periocular pleating were observed with the MACS technique.

Conclusions:

  • The MACS technique is suitable for younger patients with minimal neck laxity and allows for concurrent procedures.
  • Limitations of the MACS technique include marked skin laxity and bulky necks.
  • Both MACS and traditional facelifts have distinct advantages and limitations, guiding current practice.