The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism
Bioethics
|January 26, 2018
Summary
This study examines the metaphysical theories underpinning the future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion. It proposes that animalism, not diachronic universalism, is compatible with the FLO argument, resolving a key ethical dilemma.
Area of Science:
- Metaphysics
- Philosophy of Biology
- Bioethics
Background:
- The future-like-ours (FLO) argument, primarily supported by Marquis, presents a significant ethical challenge to abortion.
- Vogelstein identified a dilemma for FLO argument proponents, suggesting a necessary choice between abandoning diachronic universalism (DU) or deeming contraception morally impermissible.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze the metaphysical underpinnings of Marquis' future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion.
- To investigate the compatibility of the FLO argument with different metaphysical theories, specifically addressing Vogelstein's dilemma.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of the premises within Marquis' future-like-ours (FLO) argument.
- Examination of the relationship between the FLO argument, unrestricted composition, and animalism.
- Evaluation of the implications for diachronic universalism (DU) and the morality of contraception.
Main Results:
- The premises of the FLO argument can be coherently integrated with unrestricted composition.
- The FLO argument is more accurately interpreted as incorporating animalism (the view that humans are animals) rather than diachronic universalism (DU).
- This reinterpretation resolves the dilemma posed by Vogelstein, decoupling the FLO argument from the controversial stance on contraception.
Conclusions:
- Marquis' future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion is best understood through the lens of animalism.
- This metaphysical framework avoids the problematic implications for contraception previously raised by critics.
- The study reframes the debate on abortion ethics by clarifying the underlying metaphysical commitments of the FLO argument.
Related Concept Videos
Tonicity in Animals
126.3K
The tonicity of a solution determines if a cell gains or loses water in that solution. The tonicity depends on the permeability of the cell membrane for different solutes and the concentration of nonpenetrating solutes in the solution within and outside of the cell. If a semipermeable membrane hinders the passage of some solutes but allows water to follow its concentration gradient, water moves from the side with low osmolarity (i.e., less solute) to the side with higher osmolarity (i.e.,...
126.3K
Tonicity in Animals
5.6K
Tonicity describes the amount of solute in a solution. The measure of the tonicity of a solution, or the total amount of solutes dissolved in a specific amount of solution, is called its osmolarity. Three terms—hypotonic, isotonic, and hypertonic—are used to relate the osmolarity of a cell to the osmolarity of the extracellular fluid that contains the cells. In a hypotonic solution, such as tap water, the extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of solutes than the fluid inside...
5.6K
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
9.3K
Among all the organelles in an animal cell, only mitochondria have their own independent genomes. Animal mitochondrial DNA is a double-stranded, closed-circular molecule with around 20,000 base pairs. Mitochondrial DNA is unique in that one of its two strands, the heavy, or H, -strand is guanine rich, whereas the complementary strand is cytosine rich and called the light, or L, -strand. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA has a very low percentage of non-coding regions and is marked by...
9.3K
Toxicity Testing in Animals
16
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
16
Animal and Plant Cell Structure
49.1K
Animal and plant cells not only differ in their structure, function, and mode of nutrition but also in how they reproduce, specialize, and organize into complex structures.
Cell Division
Though both plant and animal cells divide by mitosis (for non-gametic cells) and meiosis (for gametic cells), they differ in the specifics of this process. Unlike animal cells, plant cells lack centrosomes — an organelle responsible for organizing the spindle fibers and segregating the chromosomes during...
Cell Division
Though both plant and animal cells divide by mitosis (for non-gametic cells) and meiosis (for gametic cells), they differ in the specifics of this process. Unlike animal cells, plant cells lack centrosomes — an organelle responsible for organizing the spindle fibers and segregating the chromosomes during...
49.1K
Routes of Persuasion
68.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
68.8K


