Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.0K
The Small x Assumption02:20

The Small x Assumption

49.9K
If a reaction has a small equilibrium constant, the equilibrium position favors the reactants. In such reactions, a negligible change in concentration may occur if the initial concentrations of reactants are high and the Kc value is small. In such circumstances, the equilibrium concentration is approximately equal to its initial concentration.  This estimation can be used to simplify the equilibrium calculations by assuming that some equilibrium concentrations are equal to the initial...
49.9K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.3K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

6.7K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
6.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic approaches and clinical challenges of imaging in peripheral nerve tumors: data from the multicenter Peripheral Nerve Tumor Registry.

Journal of neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Improving lives: Health-related quality of life after surgery for traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a single center retrospective study.

Brain & spine·2026
Same author

One-year outcomes of bioresorbable magnesium scaffold implantation in complex coronary lesions.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of ABO Blood Group on Vascular Complications and on Clinical and Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Neurology international·2026
Same author

PSA persistence in the PSMA PET era: reassessing a risk factor after radical prostatectomy.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Characterizing Pain in Peripheral Nerve Tumors: Interim Results from a Prospective Bicenter Cohort.

Cancers·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments
07:13

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

Published on: July 17, 2019

9.8K

How much confidence do we need in animal experiments? Statistical assumptions in sample size estimation.

Veronika Richter1, Rainer Muche1, Benjamin Mayer1

  • 1a Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry , Ulm University , Ulm , Germany.

Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science : JAAWS
|January 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Adjusting statistical assumptions in animal research sample size calculations can significantly reduce animal use. A less rigorous type 1 error level, for example, showed a 14% potential animal savings.

Keywords:
Exploratory statisticshypothesis generationpowertype 1 error

More Related Videos

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K
Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals
14:59

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Published on: February 13, 2021

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments
07:13

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

Published on: July 17, 2019

9.8K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K
Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals
14:59

Sampling and Analysis of Animal Scent Signals

Published on: February 13, 2021

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Laboratory Animal Science
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Statistical sample size calculation is vital for planning nonhuman animal experiments in basic medical research.
  • The 3R principle (Replace, Reduce, Refine) aims to minimize animal use.
  • Less rigorous statistical assumptions may reduce the number of animals required.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of varying statistical assumptions on sample size calculations in animal experiments.
  • To identify potential reductions in animal numbers through modified statistical parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analyzed sample size calculations from 111 biometrical reports.
  • Kept original effect size assumptions constant.
  • Varied basic statistical properties including type 1 error rate and hypothesis sidedness.

Main Results:

  • A less rigorous type 1 error assumption (one-sided 5% vs. two-sided 5%) demonstrated a 14% potential reduction in the original number of animals required.
  • Modifying statistical assumptions can lead to considerable savings in animal numbers.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers should consider less rigorous statistical assumptions for sample size calculation to optimize animal numbers in experiments.
  • This approach aligns with the 3R principle for reducing animal use in research.
  • The potential for animal number optimization warrants discussion regarding statistical methodologies.