Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
Published on: November 15, 2013
Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation
Gerard M Loughnane1, Daniel P Newman2, Sarita Tamang3
1Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland, loughnag@tcd.ie.
Tiny eye movements called microsaccades disrupt visual perception and decision-making by interfering with neural signal processing. Microsaccade production is inhibited during perceptual tasks to mitigate these negative effects on behavior.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Microsaccades, small involuntary eye movements, can disrupt stimulus detection.
- Previous research shows microsaccades influence visual regions but their effect on higher-level decision processes is unclear.
- Understanding microsaccades' role in decision-making is crucial for bridging sensory input to action selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of microsaccades on neural decision processes during visual monitoring tasks.
- To examine how microsaccades affect evidence encoding, accumulation, and motor preparation.
- To explore the relationship between microsaccade occurrence and perceptual decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Behavioral experiments measuring reaction times during visual change detection.
- Neural recordings to assess signal suppression at different decision stages.
- Analysis of microsaccade timing relative to stimulus onset and perceptual reports.
Main Results:
- Microsaccades occurring up to 800 ms after stimulus onset predicted slower reaction times.
- Neural signal suppression was observed at visual evidence encoding, accumulation, and motor preparation stages during microsaccades.
- Microsaccade production was systematically inhibited from the onset of neural decision-making until the perceptual report.
Conclusions:
- Microsaccades significantly impede perceptual decision-making by disrupting sensorimotor processing.
- Antagonistic interactions exist between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual tasks.
- Inhibition of microsaccades during perceptual tasks may serve to minimize their detrimental effects on behavior.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacokinetics
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Therapeutic Uses
Respiratory Tract: Ipratropium, aclidinium, and tiotropium treat asthma, chronic bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They protect against bronchoconstriction caused by irritants like cigarette smoke, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. They also help reduce nasopharyngeal...

