Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Evaluating Cell Death Signaling by Immunofluorescence in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 3, 2025
Relationship Between Visceral Infarction and Ischemic Stroke Subtype
Caitlin Finn1, Peter Hung1, Praneil Patel1
1From the Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, New York, NY (C.F., P.H., H.K.); and Departments of Radiology (P.P., A.G.) and Neurology (A.G., H.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Insights
Cryptogenic strokes, often presumed embolic, were linked to visceral infarcts. This study found a higher prevalence of kidney and spleen infarcts in cardioembolic and cryptogenic stroke patients compared to others.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Most cryptogenic strokes are presumed to have an embolic origin.
- Visceral infarcts, such as renal or splenic, are typically embolic in nature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between cryptogenic strokes and visceral infarcts.
- To determine if cryptogenic strokes share embolic characteristics with visceral infarcts.
Main Methods:
- Patients from the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry (CAESAR) with abdominal CT scans were analyzed.
- Stroke subtypes were classified, and the presence of renal or splenic infarcts was assessed.
- Statistical analyses, including Fisher exact test and logistic regression, were employed.
Main Results:
- Among 227 patients, 59 had visceral infarcts (35 renal, 27 splenic).
- Visceral infarction prevalence was significantly higher in cardioembolic (34.2%) and cryptogenic (23.9%) strokes compared to noncardioembolic strokes (12.5%).
- Logistic regression confirmed significant associations between visceral infarcts and both cardioembolic (OR 3.5) and cryptogenic strokes (OR 3.3).
Conclusions:
- The prevalence of visceral infarction varies significantly across ischemic stroke subtypes.
- Cardioembolic and cryptogenic strokes show a higher association with visceral infarcts, suggesting a potential shared embolic etiology.
Background And Purpose:
Most cryptogenic strokes are thought to have an embolic source. We sought to determine whether cryptogenic strokes are associated with visceral infarcts, which are usually embolic.
Methods:
Among patients prospectively enrolled in CAESAR (Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry), we selected those with a contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomographic scan within 1 year of admission. Our exposure variable was adjudicated stroke subtype per the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification. Our outcome was renal or splenic infarction as assessed by a single radiologist blinded to stroke subtype. We used Fisher exact test and multiple logistic regression to compare the prevalence of visceral infarcts among cardioembolic strokes, strokes of undetermined etiology, and noncardioembolic strokes (large- or small-vessel strokes).
Results:
Among 227 patients with ischemic stroke and a contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomographic scan, 59 had a visceral infarct (35 renal and 27 splenic). The prevalence of visceral infarction was significantly different among cardioembolic strokes (34.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7%-44.6%), strokes of undetermined etiology (23.9%; 95% CI, 15.0%-32.8%), and strokes from large-artery atherosclerosis or small-vessel occlusion (12.5%; 95% CI, 1.8%-23.2%; P=0.03). In multiple logistic regression models adjusted for demographics and vascular comorbidities, we found significant associations with visceral infarction for both cardioembolic stroke (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.9) and stroke of undetermined source (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-10.5) as compared with noncardioembolic stroke.
Conclusions:
The prevalence of visceral infarction differed significantly across ischemic stroke subtypes. Cardioembolic and cryptogenic strokes were associated with a higher prevalence of visceral infarcts than noncardioembolic strokes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Ending Relationships
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship
Relationship Growth
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase...
Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors...

