Relationship Between Visceral Infarction and Ischemic Stroke Subtype

Caitlin Finn1, Peter Hung1, Praneil Patel1

  • 1From the Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, New York, NY (C.F., P.H., H.K.); and Departments of Radiology (P.P., A.G.) and Neurology (A.G., H.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Stroke
|January 27, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Cryptogenic strokes, often presumed embolic, were linked to visceral infarcts. This study found a higher prevalence of kidney and spleen infarcts in cardioembolic and cryptogenic stroke patients compared to others.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Vascular Medicine

Background:

  • Most cryptogenic strokes are presumed to have an embolic origin.
  • Visceral infarcts, such as renal or splenic, are typically embolic in nature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between cryptogenic strokes and visceral infarcts.
  • To determine if cryptogenic strokes share embolic characteristics with visceral infarcts.

Main Methods:

  • Patients from the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry (CAESAR) with abdominal CT scans were analyzed.
  • Stroke subtypes were classified, and the presence of renal or splenic infarcts was assessed.
  • Statistical analyses, including Fisher exact test and logistic regression, were employed.

Main Results:

  • Among 227 patients, 59 had visceral infarcts (35 renal, 27 splenic).
  • Visceral infarction prevalence was significantly higher in cardioembolic (34.2%) and cryptogenic (23.9%) strokes compared to noncardioembolic strokes (12.5%).
  • Logistic regression confirmed significant associations between visceral infarcts and both cardioembolic (OR 3.5) and cryptogenic strokes (OR 3.3).

Conclusions:

  • The prevalence of visceral infarction varies significantly across ischemic stroke subtypes.
  • Cardioembolic and cryptogenic strokes show a higher association with visceral infarcts, suggesting a potential shared embolic etiology.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Ending Relationships01:28

Ending Relationships

The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...
205
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship01:14

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship

For drugs producing a quantal response, onset occurs when plasma concentration reaches a minimum effective level (Cmin). The drug's action duration depends on how long the plasma concentration remains above Cmin.Two primary factors influence this duration: dose size and the rate of drug removal from the action site. Both depend on the drug's redistribution to poorly perfused tissues and elimination processes. A larger dose promotes rapid onset and prolongs the effect's duration.Consider a...
23
Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
231
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype01:31

Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype

Adrenoceptors are classified into α and ꞵ classes based on their potencies to catecholamine agonists. α-adrenoceptors show the following order of catecholamine potency:
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase...
3.0K
Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype01:26

Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype

β-adrenoceptors have varied sensitivities towards adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline. The order of agonist potency is as follows:
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors...
3.9K