Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research
Published on: March 1, 2024
Comparison of Compressive Myofascial Release and the Graston Technique for Improving Ankle-Dorsiflexion Range of
Justin Stanek1, Taylor Sullivan2, Samantha Davis1
1School of Kinesiology & Recreation, Illinois State University, Normal.
Context:
Restricted dorsiflexion (DF) at the ankle joint can cause acute and chronic injuries at the ankle and knee. Myofascial release and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) techniques have been used to increase range of motion (ROM); however, evidence directly comparing their effectiveness is limited.
Objective:
To compare the effects of a single session of compressive myofascial release (CMR) or IASTM using the Graston Technique (GT) on closed chain ankle-DF ROM.
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants:
Participants were 44 physically active people (53 limbs) with less than 30° of DF.
Intervention(S):
Limbs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control, CMR, or GT. Both treatment groups received one 5-minute treatment that included scanning the area and treating specific restrictions. The control group sat for 5 minutes before measurements were retaken.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
Standing and kneeling ankle DF were measured before and immediately after treatment. Change scores were calculated for both positions, and two 1-way analyses of variance were conducted.
Results:
A difference between groups was found in the standing ( F2,52 = 13.78, P = .001) and kneeling ( F2,52 = 5.85, P = .01) positions. Post hoc testing showed DF improvements in the standing position after CMR compared with the GT and control groups (both P = .001). In the kneeling position, DF improved after CMR compared with the control group ( P = .005).
Conclusions:
Compressive myofascial release increased ankle DF after a single treatment in participants with DF ROM deficits. Clinicians should consider adding CMR as a treatment intervention for patients with DF deficits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Range
15.9; 16.1; 15.2; 14.8; 15.8; 15.9; 16.0; 15.5
Measurements of the amount of soda in a 16-ounce can vary since different subjects record these measurements or since the exact amount - 16 ounces of liquid, was not...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...

