Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Surgical Closure of Equine Abdomen, Prevention, and Management of Incisional Complications
Published on: May 10, 2024
Incisional Outcomes of Umbilical vs Suprapubic Mini-laparotomy for Tissue Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Kendall C Griffith1, Nisse V Clark2, Avery A Mushinski2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Study Objective:
To compare outcomes following umbilical minilaparotomy and suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction.
Design Classification:
Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting:
Two large academic medical centers.
Patients:
Women who underwent a minilaparotomy for tissue extraction following a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy between 2014 and 2016.
Interventions:
Umbilical or suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction.
Measurements And Main Results:
A total of 374 women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy with minilaparotomy, including 289 (77.3%) with an umbilical minilaparotomy and 85 (22.7%) with a suprapubic minilaparotomy. The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, parity, surgical history, procedure type, surgical approach, and surgical indication. The size of the minilaparotomy incision and the specimen weight were significantly smaller in the umbilical minilaparotomy group (mean, 3.3 ± 0.8 cm vs 4.2 ± 0.6 cm [p < .001] and 472.6 ± 357.1 g vs 683.0 ± 475.7 g [p < .001], respectively). Two women in the suprapubic minilaparotomy group sustained a bladder injury during creation of the incision. There were no other complications related to the minilaparotomy in either group. Postoperative outcomes related to the minilaparotomy incision were compiled using the medical record and a follow-up survey. Of the 374 women in this cohort, 163 responded to a detailed survey about their minilaparotomy incision (response rate, 43.5%). With regard to the minilaparotomy, 52.7% of women reported incisional symptoms; 25.9% had increased pain at the incision, 8.3% had an incisional infection, and 2.7% reported an incisional hernia. There was no significant between-group difference in incisional outcomes; however nearly 3 times as many women in the umbilical minilaparotomy group reported concerns about incisional hernia (3.1% vs 1.2%; p = .833). These findings were maintained in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. No patient or procedure characteristics were significantly associated with the development of hernia.
Conclusion:
There were no significant difference in incisional symptoms, pain, or infection following umbilical minilaparotomy vs a suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. Although not statistically significant, the rate of incisional hernia was higher at the umbilical site compared with the suprapubic site.
More Related Videos
03:05Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published on: November 21, 2025
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Extraction: Effects of pH
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Tissues