Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species
Published on: July 2, 2015
A systematic review of fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates of Cryptococcus species
Felix Bongomin1,2, Rita O Oladele1,3, Sara Gago1,4
1Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Abstract:
Fluconazole is the most commonly used antifungal agent for both the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis, and for prophylaxis against the disease. However, its prolonged use has the potential to exert selection pressure in favour of fluconazole-resistant strains. We evaluated the prevalence of fluconazole resistance in Cryptococcus spp. clinical isolates in 29 studies from 1988 to May 2017 included in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. A total of 4995 Cryptococcus isolates from 3210 patients constituted this study; 248 (5.0%) of the isolates from relapsed episodes of cryptococcosis were included in this analysis. Eleven (38%) of the studies used minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) breakpoints of ≥64 μg/mL to define fluconazole resistance, 6 (21%) used ≥32 μg/mL, 11 (38%) used ≥16 μg/mL and 1 (3%) used ≤20 μg/mL. Overall, mean prevalence of fluconazole resistance was 12.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-17.6) for all isolates (n = 4995). Mean fluconazole resistance was 10.6% (95% CI: 5.5-15.6) for the incident isolates (n = 4747) and 24.1% (95% CI: -3.1-51.2) for the relapse isolates (n = 248). Of the 4995 isolates, 936 (18.7%) had MICs above the ecological cut-off value. Fluconazole resistance appears to be an issue in Cryptococcus isolates from patients with relapses. It remains unclear whether relapses occur due to resistance or other factors. There is an urgent need to establish antifungal breakpoints for Cryptococcus spp.
Insights
Fluconazole resistance in Cryptococcus spp. is a growing concern, particularly in relapsed cases. Further research is needed to establish clear antifungal breakpoints for Cryptococcus species.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Fluconazole is a primary antifungal agent for cryptococcal meningitis treatment and prophylaxis.
- Prolonged fluconazole use may drive the emergence of resistant fungal strains.
- Understanding fluconazole resistance prevalence is crucial for effective cryptococcosis management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prevalence of fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates of Cryptococcus species.
- To analyze resistance patterns in both incident and relapsed cryptococcosis cases.
- To highlight the need for standardized antifungal breakpoints.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 studies from EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (1988-2017).
- Inclusion of 4995 Cryptococcus isolates from 3210 patients.
- Analysis of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and reported resistance breakpoints.
Main Results:
- Overall mean fluconazole resistance was 12.1% across all isolates.
- Resistance was higher in isolates from relapsed cryptococcosis (24.1%) compared to incident cases (10.6%).
- 18.7% of isolates exhibited MICs above the ecological cut-off value.
Conclusions:
- Fluconazole resistance is a significant issue in Cryptococcus isolates, especially in relapsed infections.
- The cause of relapse (resistance vs. other factors) requires further investigation.
- Establishing standardized antifungal breakpoints for Cryptococcus species is urgently needed.
More Related Videos
11:07Macrophage Cholesterol Depletion and Its Effect on the Phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans
Published on: December 19, 2014
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
What is a Species?
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Keystone Species
Formation of Species
Random and Systematic Errors