Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: deduction rules or mental models?

K M Galotti, J Baron, J P Sabini

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Homemade pericardial bifurcated graft for Q fever-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair: a case report.

    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2024
    Same author

    When echo gets in the way: physiological factors affecting Doppler data.

    Echo research and practice·2020
    Same author

    Dr. Baron's Pathological Opinions.

    The London medical and physical journal·2018
    Same author

    JAK1/3 inhibition preserves epidermal morphology in full-thickness 3D skin models of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2018
    Same author

    Sliding sign in third-trimester sonographic evaluation of intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean section: a novel technique.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2018
    Same author

    Predicting of ultrafiltration performances by advanced data analysis.

    Water research·2017
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    Good and poor reasoners utilize both mental models and deduction rules. However, good reasoners explore more possibilities, indicating superior reasoning strategies and performance compared to those without formal logic training.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Psychology of Reasoning

    Background:

    • Syllogistic reasoning is a key aspect of human cognition.
    • Understanding the cognitive processes underlying reasoning is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the cognitive correlates of syllogistic reasoning ability.
    • To determine the extent to which reasoning proficiency relies on mental models versus deduction rules.

    Main Methods:

    • Two studies were conducted on subjects lacking formal logic training.
    • Performance was assessed on a syllogistic reasoning task.
    • Comparisons were made between 'good' and 'poor' reasoners, and a group with formal logic training.

    Main Results:

    • Evidence suggests both mental models and deduction rules are employed in reasoning.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • 'Good' reasoners showed better performance under time constraints, implying superior rule utilization.
  • When time was not limited, 'good' reasoners considered more alternatives, indicating greater use of mental models.

    • Conclusions:

    • Reasoning ability is influenced by a combination of mental model consideration and rule-based deduction.
    • Individuals with formal logic training exhibit distinct differences in reasoning speed and accuracy.
    • The findings highlight the interplay between different cognitive strategies in effective reasoning.