Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Versatile Murine Model of Subcortical White Matter Stroke for the Study of Axonal Degeneration and White Matter Neurobiology
Published on: March 17, 2016
Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?
L Mark Elbroch1, Anna Kusler1,2
1Panthera, New York, NY, United States of America.
Pumas (cougars) are subordinate to several apex predators across nearly half their range, impacting their behavior and survival. Understanding these competitive dynamics is crucial for effective wildlife management and conservation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Wildlife Conservation
- Predator-Prey Dynamics
Background:
- Interspecific competition significantly influences species fitness, community structure, and geographic distribution.
- Dominance hierarchies mitigate conflict and define realized niches, particularly critical for apex predators facing both interspecific competition and human impacts.
- Pumas (cougars) are apex predators subject to hunting regulations and overlap with multiple other apex predators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the dominance status of pumas relative to sympatric apex predators and mesocarnivores across their range.
- To analyze the spatial distribution of pumas in relation to dominant competitors.
- To inform wildlife management strategies regarding puma harvest limits in areas of high interspecific competition.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a comprehensive literature search using 64 sources to evaluate puma dominance with apex predators and 13 sources for mesocarnivores.
- Analyzed spatial distribution data to determine areas where pumas are dominant versus subordinate.
- Synthesized evidence on interspecific interactions and competitive hierarchies.
Main Results:
- Pumas are subordinate to wolves, grizzly bears, black bears, and jaguars, but dominant over coyotes and maned wolves.
- Pumas exhibit dominance over sympatric felid mesocarnivores (ocelot, bobcat, Canada lynx).
- Pumas are subordinate to at least one dominant apex carnivore across 47.5% of their extensive North and South American range.
Conclusions:
- Subordinate pumas experience negative effects including habitat displacement, reduced food access, increased energy expenditure, starvation, and direct mortality from competitors.
- There is a critical need for research linking competitive costs directly to puma fitness and assessing synergistic effects of competition and human management.
- Caution is advised for wildlife managers setting puma harvest limits, especially in areas with recovering or recolonizing dominant predators like wolves and grizzly bears, to account for realized competition scenarios.
Related Concept Videos
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
Classifying Matter by State
Classifying Matter by Composition
According to its composition, the matter can be classified into two broad categories — pure substances and mixtures.
A pure substance is a form of matter that has a constant composition throughout with uniform properties. For example, any sample of sucrose has the same composition and same physical properties, such as melting point, color, and sweetness, regardless of the source from which it is isolated.
A mixture is composed of two or...
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
What is Matter?
The Atomic Theory of Matter

