Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Experimental Melanoma Immunotherapy Model Using Tumor Vaccination with a Hematopoietic Cytokine
Published on: February 24, 2023
Electrotransfer of Different Control Plasmids Elicits Different Antitumor Effectiveness in B16.F10 Melanoma
Masa Bosnjak1, Tanja Jesenko2, Urska Kamensek3
1Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. mbosnjak@onko-i.si.
Abstract:
Several studies have shown that different control plasmids may cause antitumor action in different murine tumor models after gene electrotransfer (GET). Due to the differences in GET protocols, plasmid vectors, and experimental models, the observed antitumor effects were incomparable. Therefore, the current study was conducted comparing antitumor effectiveness of three different control plasmids using the same GET parameters. We followed cytotoxicity in vitro and the antitumor effect in vivo after GET of control plasmids pControl, pENTR/U6 scr and pVAX1 in B16.F10 murine melanoma cells and tumors. Types of cell death and upregulation of selected cytosolic DNA sensors and cytokines were determined. GET of all three plasmids caused significant growth delay in melanoma tumors; nevertheless, the effect of pVAX1 was significantly greater than pControl. While DNA sensors in vivo were not upregulated significantly, cytokines IFN β and TNF α were upregulated after GET of pVAX1. In vitro, the mRNAs of some cytosolic DNA sensors were overexpressed after GET; however, with no significant difference among the three plasmids. In summary, although differences in antitumor effects were observed among control plasmids in vivo, no differences in cellular responses to plasmid GET were detected in tumor cells in vitro. Thus, the tumor microenvironment as well as some plasmid properties are most probably responsible for the antitumor effectiveness.
Insights
Gene electrotransfer (GET) of control plasmids showed varying antitumor effects in melanoma. The pVAX1 plasmid demonstrated superior efficacy in vivo, suggesting the tumor microenvironment influences outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Different control plasmids exhibit varying antitumor effects post-gene electrotransfer (GET) in murine models.
- Incomparable results across studies stem from variations in GET protocols, plasmid vectors, and experimental models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the antitumor effectiveness of three distinct control plasmids (pControl, pENTR/U6 scr, pVAX1) using standardized GET parameters.
- To investigate cellular responses, including cell death and the upregulation of cytosolic DNA sensors and cytokines, following GET of these plasmids in B16.F10 melanoma cells and tumors.
Main Methods:
- In vitro cytotoxicity assays and in vivo antitumor efficacy assessments in B16.F10 melanoma models.
- Analysis of cell death mechanisms and quantification of selected cytosolic DNA sensors and cytokine mRNA/protein levels post-GET.
- Standardized GET parameters were applied across all experimental groups.
Main Results:
- All three plasmids induced significant melanoma tumor growth delay, with pVAX1 showing a markedly greater effect than pControl.
- In vivo, while DNA sensors showed no significant upregulation, cytokines IFN-β and TNF-α were elevated after pVAX1 GET.
- In vitro, GET led to overexpression of some cytosolic DNA sensor mRNAs, but without significant differences among the plasmids.
Conclusions:
- Control plasmid choice impacts in vivo antitumor effectiveness in melanoma models, with pVAX1 demonstrating superior performance.
- Cellular responses in vitro did not significantly differ across the tested plasmids, indicating that the tumor microenvironment and plasmid properties are key determinants of in vivo efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Plasmids
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Framing Effects
Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
Biological Effects of Radiation
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...

