Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Flow-sorting and Exome Sequencing of the Reed-Sternberg Cells of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Published on: June 10, 2017
Shared decision making: Implications for return of results from whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing
Susan T Vadaparampil1,2, Deborah Cragun1,3
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Population Science, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Tampa, FL, USA.
Abstract:
In this issue, Kaphingst and colleagues report on young breast cancer patient's preferences for learning about various results from genomic sequencing. In our commentary, we discuss the results in light of the burgeoning clinical use of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS). In particular, we consider findings in the context of a Shared Decision Making approach to return of results. We also identify additional important factors to consider that may influence patient preferences that were largely absent from the paper by Kaphingst and colleagues, including cultural context, costs of testing, and provider factors.
Related Concept Videos
Genomics
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Cis-regulatory Sequences

