Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

06:38
Pattern-based Search of Epigenomic Data Using GeNemo
Published on: October 8, 2017
5.4K
Outcome predictability biases cued search
Oren Griffiths1, May Erlinger1, Tom Beesley2
1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales Sydney.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 2, 2018
Summary
People prioritize learning about predictable outcomes. Previously unpredictable stimuli were learned about less readily than predictable ones, suggesting a bias in learning mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Associative Learning
Background:
- Humans and animals prioritize learning about environmental cues with a history of reinforcement (predictiveness bias).
- Less is understood about whether past outcome predictability influences learning (predictability bias).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if prior predictability of an outcome influences learning in a contingency learning task.
- To determine if a predictability bias exists, as predicted by formal associative learning models.
Main Methods:
- Experimental assessment of learning biases in a contingency learning task.
- Comparison of learning rates for previously unpredictable versus previously predictable stimuli.
Main Results:
- Previously unpredictable stimuli were learned about less effectively than previously predictable stimuli.
- This effect was not explained by strategic search or contextual blocking.
Conclusions:
- Findings suggest a biased learning mechanism influences how individuals learn about outcomes.
- The results challenge existing formal models of associative learning that do not account for predictability bias.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
11.0K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
11.0K
Hindsight Biases
4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.3K
Confirmation Biases
8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Bias
7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Predicting Molecular Geometry
46.2K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.2K
Correspondence Bias
234
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
234

