Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

11.0K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
11.0K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

46.2K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.2K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

234
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
234

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction and Prioritisation: How Reward Learning Shapes Attentional Capture.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Training SONAR spatial interpretation using virtual reality.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025
Same author

Mechanisms underlying the accuracy of stimulus representations: Within-event learning and outcome mediation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech.

eNeuro·2025
Same author

Effects of instructed and experienced uncertainty on attentional priority.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Apparent statistical inference in crows may reflect simple reinforcement learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Pattern-based Search of Epigenomic Data Using GeNemo
06:38

Pattern-based Search of Epigenomic Data Using GeNemo

Published on: October 8, 2017

5.4K

Outcome predictability biases cued search.

Oren Griffiths1, May Erlinger1, Tom Beesley2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales Sydney.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 2, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People prioritize learning about predictable outcomes. Previously unpredictable stimuli were learned about less readily than predictable ones, suggesting a bias in learning mechanisms.

More Related Videos

Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
02:15

Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Published on: March 1, 2024

916
Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication
03:53

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Pattern-based Search of Epigenomic Data Using GeNemo
06:38

Pattern-based Search of Epigenomic Data Using GeNemo

Published on: October 8, 2017

5.4K
Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
02:15

Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Published on: March 1, 2024

916
Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication
03:53

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Associative Learning

Background:

  • Humans and animals prioritize learning about environmental cues with a history of reinforcement (predictiveness bias).
  • Less is understood about whether past outcome predictability influences learning (predictability bias).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if prior predictability of an outcome influences learning in a contingency learning task.
  • To determine if a predictability bias exists, as predicted by formal associative learning models.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental assessment of learning biases in a contingency learning task.
  • Comparison of learning rates for previously unpredictable versus previously predictable stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Previously unpredictable stimuli were learned about less effectively than previously predictable stimuli.
  • This effect was not explained by strategic search or contextual blocking.

Conclusions:

  • Findings suggest a biased learning mechanism influences how individuals learn about outcomes.
  • The results challenge existing formal models of associative learning that do not account for predictability bias.