A validation study of the CirCom comorbidity score in an English cirrhosis population using the Clinical Practice

Colin J Crooks1,2, Joe West1,2, Peter Jepsen3,4

  • 1Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Clinical Epidemiology
|February 3, 2018
PubMed

Insights

The CirCom score slightly improves prediction of all-cause mortality in cirrhosis patients compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). It better predicts non-liver-related deaths, but not liver-specific mortality.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The CirCom score, developed in Denmark, assesses comorbidity in cirrhosis patients to predict mortality.
  • The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a widely used comorbidity measure.
  • Comparing these scores in an English cirrhosis population is crucial for validating their utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of the CirCom score against the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in predicting all-cause mortality in a UK cirrhosis cohort.
  • To evaluate the scores' ability to predict liver-related versus non-liver-related deaths.
  • To assess performance across different patient demographics and cirrhosis characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • A survival model was employed using comorbidity scores within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink cirrhosis cohort.
  • Model discrimination was compared using the C statistic, analyzing performance by age, gender, socioeconomic status, cirrhosis etiology, stage, and time since diagnosis.
  • The ability of each score to predict liver-related and non-liver-related mortality was specifically measured.

Main Results:

  • The CirCom score showed a marginal improvement in predictive accuracy (C statistic 0.63) over the CCI (C statistic 0.62), with a 1.5% improvement in the net reclassification index.
  • Performance improvements were more pronounced in younger patients, those with alcoholic cirrhosis, and those with compensated cirrhosis.
  • Both scores demonstrated better prediction for non-liver-related deaths (C statistic >0.7) than for liver-related deaths (C statistic <0.6).

Conclusions:

  • The CirCom score offers a slight enhancement over the CCI for predicting overall and non-liver mortality in cirrhosis patients.
  • Neither score effectively predicts liver-related mortality, indicating comorbidity is a weak predictor for this outcome.
  • Incorporating comorbidity measures alongside cirrhosis severity assessments is vital for accurate survival prediction in cirrhosis studies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.1K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
533
What is Population Genetics?01:25

What is Population Genetics?

A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
65.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.3K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.7K