Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Automated Protocols for Macromolecular Crystallization at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Published on: January 24, 2018
Which One is Bulkier: The 3,5-Dimethylphenyl or the 2,6-Dimethylphenyl Group? Development of Size-Complementary
Hiroki Sato1, Daisuke Aoki1, Toshikazu Takata1,2
1Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan.
Abstract:
We developed novel size-complementary molecular and macromolecular rotaxanes using a 2,6-dimethylphenyl terminal group as the axle-end-cap group in dibenzo-24-crown-8-ether (DB24C8)-based rotaxanes, where the 2,6-dimethylphenyl group was found to be less bulky than the 3,5-dimethylphenyl group. A series of molecular and macromolecular [2]rotaxanes that bear a 2,6-dimethylphenyl group as the axle-end-cap were synthesized using unsubstituted and fluorine-substituted DB24C8. Base-induced decomposition into their constituent components confirmed the occurrence of deslipping, which supports the size-complementarity of these rotaxanes. The deslipping rate was independent of the axle length but dependent on the DB24C8 substituents. A kinetic study indicated the rate-determining step was that in which the wheel is getting over the end-cap group, and deslipping proceeded via a hopping-over mechanism. Finally, the present deslipping behavior was applied to a stimulus-degradable polymer as an example for the versatile utility of this concept in the context of stimulus-responsive materials.
Related Concept Videos
Complementary DNA
Basic Postulates of Kinetic Molecular Theory: Particle Size, Energy, and Collision
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Molecular Models
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Molecular Orbital Theory I

