Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
Mitral Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area Predicts Pulmonary Artery Pressure Level in Patients with Aortic Valve
Giovanni Benfari1, Stefano Nistri2, Pompilio Faggiano3
1Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Background:
Mitral regurgitation (MR) and elevated pulmonary artery pressure are common findings in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). The pathophysiologic role of quantitatively defined MR as a determinant of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is incompletely characterized across the whole spectrum of AS degrees. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the quantification of MR reveals a link to PH in patients with AS.
Methods:
Consecutive patients undergoing comprehensive echocardiography and presenting peak aortic velocity ≥ 2.5 m/sec were prospectively enrolled. Effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) and regurgitant volume were obtained using the proximal isovelocity surface area method. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure was calculated by adding right atrial pressure to the tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient.
Results:
A total of 642 patients were enrolled between 2008 and 2013 (mean age, 79 ± 11 years; mean ejection fraction, 62 ± 10%; mean aortic valve area, 1.09 ± 0.39 cm2); MR was present in 187 (29%). Of note, 154 of 187 patients (82%) showed ERO < 0.20 cm2. ERO and regurgitant volume had the most significant associations with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (R2 = 0.30 and R2 = 0.35, respectively, P < .0001). This relationship persisted after multivariate adjustment and in the subgroups of patients with severe AS or reduced ejection fraction (P < .0001). For each 0.10-cm2 increase, the odds ratio for PH was 3.56 (95% CI, 2.65-4.86; P < .0001).
Conclusions:
In patients with MR and a wide range of AS severity, ERO is independently associated with PH. Also, the role of MR quantification appears stronger than other continuous variables commonly associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, such as E/e' ratio and left atrial volume.
Insights
Quantifying mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) reveals a significant link to pulmonary hypertension (PH). Increased effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) independently predicts PH, highlighting MR
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Pulmonary Hypertension
Background:
- Mitral regurgitation (MR) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are common in aortic valve stenosis (AS).
- The role of quantified MR in causing PH across AS severity is not fully understood.
- This study investigates the link between quantified MR and PH in AS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if quantitative MR measurements are associated with PH in patients with AS.
- To explore the independent contribution of MR quantification to PH.
- To compare the association of MR quantification with PH to other diastolic dysfunction markers.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 642 patients with AS (peak aortic velocity ≥ 2.5 m/sec).
- Echocardiography used to measure effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) and regurgitant volume via proximal isovelocity surface area.
- Systolic pulmonary artery pressure calculated using tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient and right atrial pressure.
Main Results:
- MR was present in 29% of patients; 82% had ERO < 0.20 cm².
- ERO and regurgitant volume showed significant associations with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (R²=0.30 and R²=0.35, P<.0001).
- This association persisted after multivariate adjustment and in subgroups with severe AS or reduced ejection fraction (OR for PH: 3.56 per 0.10 cm² ERO increase).
Conclusions:
- Effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) is independently associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic valve stenosis (AS).
- MR quantification, particularly ERO, appears to be a stronger predictor of PH than other markers of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
- These findings emphasize the importance of quantifying MR in the management of AS patients with or at risk for PH.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

