Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Are Foley catheters needed after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum?
Tyler C Friske1, Richard Sola2, Yangyang R Yu3
1Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Background:
High narcotic requirements after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) can increase the risk of urinary retention. Placement of intraoperative Foley catheters to minimize this risk is variable. This study determines the rate of urinary retention in this population to guide future practice.
Materials And Methods:
We reviewed retrospectively all patients who underwent MIRPE from January 2012 to July 2016 at 2 academic children's hospitals. Data collected included demographics, BMI, severity of the pectus defect, postoperative pain management, and the incidence of urinary retention and urinary tract infection (UTI).
Results:
Of 360 total patients who underwent MIRPE, 218 had an intraoperative Foley catheter. Patients with epidural pain control were more likely to receive a Foley catheter. The urinary retention rate was 34% for patients without an intraoperative Foley, and 1% in patients after removal of an intraoperatively placed Foley. Urinary retention was greater with an epidural compared with patient-controlled anesthesia (55% vs 26%, P = .002) in the no intraoperative Foley group. No urinary tract infections were identified. Epidural pain control was the only risk factor on multivariate analysis for retention in patients without an intraoperatively Foley catheter.
Conclusion:
Intraoperative Foley catheters obviate urinary retention without increasing the risk of urinary tract infection after MIRPE. These results will allow surgeons to better counsel patients regarding Foley placement.
Insights
Intraoperative Foley catheters significantly reduce urinary retention after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). This practice is safe and effective, guiding future surgical recommendations for pectus excavatum repair.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urology
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) can lead to high narcotic requirements, increasing urinary retention risk.
- The use of intraoperative Foley catheters to mitigate this risk varies.
- This study investigates the incidence of urinary retention following MIRPE.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the rate of urinary retention in patients undergoing MIRPE.
- To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative Foley catheter placement in preventing urinary retention.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice regarding Foley catheter use in MIRPE.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 360 patients who underwent MIRPE between January 2012 and July 2016 at two academic children's hospitals.
- Data collection included patient demographics, BMI, pectus defect severity, pain management strategies, and incidence of urinary retention and urinary tract infection (UTI).
- Comparison of urinary retention rates between patients with and without intraoperative Foley catheters, and analysis of risk factors including pain management.
Main Results:
- Of 360 patients, 218 received an intraoperative Foley catheter, often associated with epidural pain control.
- The urinary retention rate was 34% in patients without a Foley catheter versus 1% in those with an intraoperatively placed Foley.
- Epidural pain control was identified as a significant risk factor for urinary retention in the absence of a Foley catheter (55% vs. 26% with patient-controlled anesthesia). No UTIs were reported.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative Foley catheter placement effectively prevents urinary retention after MIRPE.
- This intervention does not increase the risk of urinary tract infections.
- Findings support routine use of intraoperative Foley catheters to improve patient outcomes and inform surgical counseling.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...

