Covariant Structure of Models of Geophysical Fluid Motion

Geophysical models approximate classical fluid motion in rotating frames. Even accurate approximations can have profound consequences, such as the loss of inertial frames. If geophysical fluid dynamics are not strictly equivalent to Newtonian hydrodynamics observed in a rotating frame, what kind of dynamics are they? We aim to clarify fundamental similarities and differences between relativistic, Newtonian, and geophysical hydrodynamics, using variational and covariant formulations as tools to shed the necessary light. A space-time variational principle for the motion of a perfect fluid is introduced. The geophysical action is interpreted as a synchronous limit of the relativistic action. The relativistic Levi-Civita connection also has a finite synchronous limit, which provides a connection with which to endow geophysical space-time, generalizing Cartan (1923). A covariant mass-momentum budget is obtained using covariance of the action and metric-preserving properties of the connection. Ultimately, geophysical models are found to differ from the standard compressible Euler model only by a specific choice of a metric-Coriolis-geopotential tensor akin to the relativistic space-time metric. Once this choice is made, the same covariant mass-momentum budget applies to Newtonian and all geophysical hydrodynamics, including those models lacking an inertial frame. Hence, it is argued that this mass-momentum budget provides an appropriate, common fundamental principle of dynamics. The postulate that Euclidean, inertial frames exist can then be regarded as part of the Newtonian theory of gravitation, which some models of geophysical hydrodynamics slightly violate.