Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Published on: August 30, 2020
A subarachnoid haemorrhage-specific outcome tool
Adrian Pace1, Sophie Mitchell2, Elizabeth Casselden2
1Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Functional outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage has traditionally been assessed using scales developed for other neurological conditions. The modified Rankin score and Glasgow Outcome Scale are most commonly used. Employment of these scales in subarachnoid haemorrhage is hampered by well recognized limitations. We set out to develop and validate a new condition-specific subarachnoid haemorrhage outcome tool (SAHOT). Items addressing diverse aspects of the impact of subarachnoid haemorrhage were collected during focus groups involving patients, next-of-kin and multidisciplinary professionals involved in subarachnoid haemorrhage management. After a series of iterative revisions, the resultant questionnaire was applied to patients and their next-of-kin at 1, 3 and 6 months post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch methodology was used to finalize the structure of the questionnaire and explore the extent to which SAHOT scores met Rasch-based criteria of successful measurement. The SAHOT was further assessed using traditional scale evaluation techniques, and validated in a second separate subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The final SAHOT included 56 items dealing with cognitive, physical, and behavioural/psychological consequences of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch analysis indicated the scale successfully measured functional outcome post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Three item scoring categories produced the best scale performance. There was no evidence of differential item functioning between patients and next-of-kin. The SAHOT was found to be acceptable, have good convergent and divergent validity, good discrimination and excellent responsiveness. It was successfully validated in a second subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The SAHOT offers the first subarachnoid haemorrhage-specific scientifically robust outcome measure with potential utility in neurovascular clinical services and research studies.
Functional outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage has traditionally been assessed using scales developed for other neurological conditions. The modified Rankin score and Glasgow Outcome Scale are most commonly used. Employment of these scales in subarachnoid haemorrhage is hampered by well recognized limitations. We set out to develop and validate a new condition-specific subarachnoid haemorrhage outcome tool (SAHOT). Items addressing diverse aspects of the impact of subarachnoid haemorrhage were collected during focus groups involving patients, next-of-kin and multidisciplinary professionals involved in subarachnoid haemorrhage management. After a series of iterative revisions, the resultant questionnaire was applied to patients and their next-of-kin at 1, 3 and 6 months post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch methodology was used to finalize the structure of the questionnaire and explore the extent to which SAHOT scores met Rasch-based criteria of successful measurement. The SAHOT was further assessed using traditional scale evaluation techniques, and validated in a second separate subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The final SAHOT included 56 items dealing with cognitive, physical, and behavioural/psychological consequences of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch analysis indicated the scale successfully measured functional outcome post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Three item scoring categories produced the best scale performance. There was no evidence of differential item functioning between patients and next-of-kin. The SAHOT was found to be acceptable, have good convergent and divergent validity, good discrimination and excellent responsiveness. It was successfully validated in a second subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The SAHOT offers the first subarachnoid haemorrhage-specific scientifically robust outcome measure with potential utility in neurovascular clinical services and research studies.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Specific Heat
For example, increasing the temperature of one gram of water by 1°C requires one calorie of heat energy and can be written as 1 cal/g-°C, or...
Density, Specific Weight, Specific Gravity and Compressibility of Fluid
Specific weight represents the weight per unit volume and is calculated by multiplying...

