Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classifying multidimensional stimuli: stimulus, task, and observer factors.

T B Ward, C M Foley, J Cole

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |May 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Different goals, common ground: A global perspective on dairy breeding objectives.

    JDS communications·2026
    Same author

    APOB to estimated APOB ratio for screening for the APOE2 genotype.

    medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
    Same author

    The effect of pollutant exposure on cough in progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

    IJTLD open·2025
    Same author

    Sedation, temperature and pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation-The STEPCARE trial: A statistical analysis plan.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
    Same author

    Development and evaluation of a high-fidelity, multi-disciplinary simulation training course for high-consequence infectious diseases using fluorescence visualization.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2024
    Same author

    Multilingual tactical combat casualty care card: a combined Japanese self defense force and US military project.

    BMJ military health·2024
    Same journal

    Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    See all related articles

    Individual differences in stimulus classification depend on stimulus type and processing abilities. Some stimuli reveal variations in response tempo and selective processing, unlike others, influencing how observers categorize information.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Perception Science

    Background:

    • Observers classify stimuli using either dimensional identity or overall similarity.
    • Understanding factors influencing these classification strategies is crucial for cognitive models.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the interrelations among factors determining the use of dimensional identity versus overall similarity in stimulus classification.
    • To explore individual and developmental differences in classification strategies.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants classified various stimuli (e.g., size/brightness, length/density, saturation/brightness).
    • Classifications were analyzed in relation to individual differences, response tempo, selective processing ability, and task demands.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Stimuli like size/brightness and length/density showed significant individual differences, influenced by response tempo, selective processing, and task demands.
    • Stimuli like saturation/brightness did not exhibit these individual differences or influences.
    • The former category of stimuli also showed developmental differences, unlike the latter.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual and developmental differences in stimulus classification are linked to response tempo and selective processing ability.
    • Certain stimulus types act as boundary conditions, unaffected by these individual processing variations.
    • Findings support an integral-to-separable processing model of perception and cognition.