Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

The Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill for Knee Osteoarthritis Rehabilitation
Published on: July 22, 2019
The impact of staffing model in a 6-day rehabilitation physiotherapy service
E L Caruana1,2, S S Kuys3, J Clarke3
1School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Background And Purpose:
The impact of staffing model providing weekend physiotherapy rehabilitation has not been evaluated. This study aims to determine the impact of staffing a weekend rehabilitation service with physiotherapists currently working in rehabilitation compared to acute hospital physiotherapists, on length of stay (LOS), functional independence and gait and balance, and to determine the impact on neurological, orthopaedic, and reconditioning diagnostic groups.
Methods:
A prospective cohort study with historical control was completed in a private, metropolitan Australian rehabilitation unit. All participants admitted to the rehabilitation unit over two, 20-week periods in 2011 and 2012 were included. Weekend physiotherapy was provided by physiotherapists working in rehabilitation in 2012 (intervention) and physiotherapists working in the acute wards in 2011 (control). Outcomes included LOS, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and gait and balance measures.
Results:
Overall, there were 504 participants; 234 in 2012 and 270 in 2011. No difference was found in LOS between staffing models (mean difference-1.5 days, 95%CI -4.4 to 1.3). Greater FIM change (mean difference 3.5, 95%CI 0.3 to 6.7) and efficiency (FIM change/LOS: mean difference 0.3, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.5) were found with rehabilitation compared to acute staffing. There was no between-group difference in gait or balance performance. When diagnostic groups were compared, no difference in LOS was found between staffing models. Participants with an orthopaedic diagnosis had a significantly greater FIM change (mean difference 3.8, 95%CI 0.4 to 7.1), whereas FIM efficiency was improved in neurological (mean difference 0.4, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.7) and orthopaedic populations (mean difference 0.3, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.5) with rehabilitation staffing.
Discussion:
Staffing a weekend rehabilitation service with physiotherapists currently working in rehabilitation influences functional independence. Different diagnostic groups appear to respond differently.
More Related Videos
07:15Author Spotlight: Understanding Adolescent Social Adversity Effects on Neurodevelopment in Mice
Published on: March 15, 2024
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...