Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in sub-Saharan African populations - Comparative analysis of risk algorithms
Daniel Boateng1, Charles Agyemang2, Erik Beune2
1Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Insights
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction varies between Ghanaian migrants and those in Ghana. Current risk equations are not interchangeable and require validation for African populations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Validated absolute risk equations are standard for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification.
- Consensus on appropriate CVD risk equations for Sub-Saharan African populations is lacking.
- This study assesses agreement between different CVD risk equations in Ghanaian populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between Framingham (laboratory and non-laboratory) and Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for 10-year CVD risk.
- To compare risk stratification in Ghanaian migrants versus home populations.
- To determine the interchangeability of different CVD risk algorithms in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Calculated 10-year CVD risks for 3586 Ghanaians (aged 40-70) in Ghana and Europe using Framingham and PCE algorithms.
- Classified participants into low (<10%), moderate (10-20%), and high (>20%) risk categories.
- Assessed algorithm agreement using kappa and correlation coefficients.
Main Results:
- High 10-year CVD risk prevalence varied: 19.4% (Framingham non-lab), 12.3% (Framingham lab), and 5.8% (PCE).
- Concordance between PCE and Framingham non-lab was higher in Ghana than among migrants.
- Concordance between PCE and Framingham lab was higher among migrants than in Ghana.
Conclusions:
- CVD risk prediction differs between Ghanaian migrant and home populations using the same algorithm.
- Limited interchangeability exists between Framingham laboratory and non-laboratory algorithms.
- Further validation against actual CVD outcomes is crucial for selecting appropriate risk algorithms for African ancestry populations.
Background:
Validated absolute risk equations are currently recommended as the basis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification in prevention and control strategies. However, there is no consensus on appropriate equations for sub-Saharan African populations. We assessed agreement between different cardiovascular risk equations among Ghanaian migrant and home populations with no overt CVD.
Methods:
The 10-year CVD risks were calculated for 3586 participants aged 40-70years in the multi-centre RODAM study among Ghanaians residing in Ghana and Europe using the Framingham laboratory and non-laboratory and Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) algorithms. Participants were classified as low, moderate or high risk, corresponding to <10%, 10-20% and >20% respectively. Agreement between the risk algorithms was assessed using kappa and correlation coefficients.
Results:
19.4%, 12.3% and 5.8% were ranked as high 10-year CVD risk by Framingham non-laboratory, Framingham laboratory and PCE, respectively. The median (25th-75th percentiles) estimated 10-year CVD risk was 9.5% (5.4-15.7), 7.3% (3.9-13.2) and 5.0% (2.3-9.7) for Framingham non-laboratory, Framingham laboratory and PCE, respectively. The concordance between PCE and Framingham non-laboratory was better in the home Ghanaian population (kappa=0.42, r=0.738) than the migrant population (kappa=0.24, r=0.732) whereas concordance between PCE and Framingham laboratory was better in migrant Ghanaians (kappa=0.54, r=0.769) than the home population (kappa=0.51, r=0.758).
Conclusion:
CVD prediction with the same algorithm differs for the migrant and home populations and the interchangeability of Framingham laboratory and non-laboratory algorithms is limited. Validation against CVD outcomes is needed to inform appropriate selection of risk algorithms for use in African ancestry populations.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Conservation of Small Populations
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

