Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Cognitive fatigue effects on physical performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Terry McMorris1, Martin Barwood2, Beverley J Hale3
1Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, Guildhall Walk, Portsmouth PO1 2ER, United Kingdom; Department Sport and Exercise Science, Institute for Sport, University of Chichester, College Lane, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 6PE, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom.
Cognitive fatigue may slightly impact physical performance, but this meta-analysis suggests the effect is likely due to random error, not a true performance decline. Further research is needed to confirm cognitive fatigue achievement.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Cognitive fatigue is theorized to impair physical performance through mechanisms like brain energy depletion or neurotransmitter changes.
- Existing literature questions whether 90 minutes of cognitive activity can significantly deplete these resources.
- The relationship between cognitive fatigue and subsequent physical performance requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on the effect of cognitive fatigue on subsequent physical performance.
- To determine if cognitive fatigue, as induced by tasks up to 90 minutes, has a significant impact on physical capabilities.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search and meta-analytic review were conducted.
- Studies comparing physical performance after a cognitive fatigue task versus a control condition were included.
- Statistical analysis included pooled effect size calculation and heterogeneity testing.
Main Results:
- A small but statistically significant pooled effect size (g = -0.27) indicated a negative impact of cognitive fatigue on physical performance.
- However, low heterogeneity (p > 0.10) suggested the observed differences were likely due to random error rather than a consistent effect.
- No evidence of publication bias was found.
Conclusions:
- The findings present a contradiction: a statistically significant effect size exists, yet heterogeneity tests indicate it may not represent a real-world effect.
- The current evidence does not robustly support the claim that cognitive fatigue significantly impairs physical performance.
- Future studies should incorporate neuroscientific measures to objectively confirm the induction of cognitive fatigue.
Related Concept Videos
Fatigue
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Cognitive Dissonance
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

