Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
David M Levine1,2, Kei Ouchi3,4, Bonnie Blanchfield5,3
1Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.harvard.edu.
Background:
Hospitals are standard of care for acute illness, but hospitals can be unsafe, uncomfortable, and expensive. Providing substitutive hospital-level care in a patient's home potentially reduces cost while maintaining or improving quality, safety, and patient experience, although evidence from randomized controlled trials in the US is lacking.
Objective:
Determine if home hospital care reduces cost while maintaining quality, safety, and patient experience.
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Participants:
Adults admitted via the emergency department with any infection or exacerbation of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma.
Intervention:
Home hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, continuous monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing.
Main Measures:
Primary outcome was direct cost of the acute care episode. Secondary outcomes included utilization, 30-day cost, physical activity, and patient experience.
Key Results:
Nine patients were randomized to home, 11 to usual care. Median direct cost of the acute care episode for home patients was 52% (IQR, 28%; p = 0.05) lower than for control patients. During the care episode, home patients had fewer laboratory orders (median per admission: 6 vs. 19; p < 0.01) and less often received consultations (0% vs. 27%; p = 0.04). Home patients were more physically active (median minutes, 209 vs. 78; p < 0.01), with a trend toward more sleep. No adverse events occurred in home patients, one occurred in control patients. Median direct cost for the acute care plus 30-day post-discharge period for home patients was 67% (IQR, 77%; p < 0.01) lower, with trends toward less use of home-care services (22% vs. 55%; p = 0.08) and fewer readmissions (11% vs. 36%; p = 0.32). Patient experience was similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
The use of substitutive home-hospitalization compared to in-hospital usual care reduced cost and utilization and improved physical activity. No significant differences in quality, safety, and patient experience were noted, with more definitive results awaiting a larger trial. Trial Registration NCT02864420.
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Hospitals-I
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pilot and Numeric Relaying

