Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

18
The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing...
18
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

655
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
655
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Findings of a videofluoroscopic swallowing study in patients with dysphagia.

Frontiers in neurology·2023
Same author

Analysis of changes in the spatiotemporal characteristics of impervious surfaces and their influencing factors in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration of China from 2000 to 2018.

Heliyon·2023
Same author

Nanoparticle-mediated synergistic anticancer effect of ferroptosis and photodynamic therapy: Novel insights and perspectives.

Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2023
Same author

Review on Processing Methods of Toxic Chinese Materia Medica and the Related Mechanisms of Action.

The American journal of Chinese medicine·2023
Same author

Pro‑angiogenic activity of salvianolate and its potential therapeutic effect against acute cerebral ischemia.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine·2023
Same author

CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in Cancer: from Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.

International journal of biological sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
09:05

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

8.5K

Linear Model Selection when Covariates Contain Errors.

Xinyu Zhang1, Haiying Wang2, Yanyuan Ma3

  • 1Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, xinyu@amss.ac.cn.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|February 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel model selection procedure for linear regression models with measurement errors. It enables accurate prediction evaluation, overcoming common difficulties and achieving optimal performance even with imperfect covariate data.

Keywords:
Errors in covariatesLoss efficiencyMeasurement errorModel selectionSelection consistency

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
09:05

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

8.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Prediction precision is a key metric for model evaluation in practical applications.
  • Covariates measured with errors pose a significant challenge for direct prediction evaluation.
  • Existing methods struggle to assess model performance when covariate data is imprecise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a model selection procedure for linear regression models with measurement errors.
  • To enable accurate prediction evaluation despite imperfect covariate data.
  • To achieve optimality properties comparable to models without measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing special properties of moment relations in linear regression models.
  • Developing a novel model selection procedure tailored for measurement error contexts.
  • Leveraging theoretical advancements to bypass direct prediction evaluation on erroneous data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed procedure allows for effective prediction evaluation with covariates measured with errors.
  • It achieves the same optimality properties as classical linear regression models without measurement error.
  • Asymptotically, it selects the model with minimum prediction error or the smallest correct model for linear relations.

Conclusions:

  • The developed model selection procedure is a valuable tool for prediction tasks involving measurement error.
  • It provides a robust method for model selection and performance assessment in challenging data scenarios.
  • The procedure is particularly useful when future, error-free covariate data becomes available.