Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
[On demand infant formula vs. gastric capacity during the neonatal transition period]
Gisela Jiménez-García1, Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías2, T Fernando Ferreira-Jaime1
1Facultad Mexicana de Medicina, Departamento de Posgrado, Universidad La Salle, México D.F., México; Departamento de Pediatría, Nuevo Sanatorio Durango, México D.F., México.
Background:
Newborn formula feeding can be given ad libitum (AL) or as calculated gastric capacity (CGC). The objective of the study was to determine if the technique used to offer the newborn formula (AL vs. CGC) modifies volume intake, tolerance and risk for hypoglycemia.
Methods:
The study design was an open, nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients were healthy term newborns. All newborns were followed for 24h. We determined the total volume ingested (ml/kg), oral tolerance (vomiting, regurgitation, abdominal circumference), impact on weight and hypoglycemic events.
Results:
One hundred fifty four infants were included (CGC=90 and AL=64). The AL group consumed slightly more formula (8ml/kg, 95% CI 5-11) with greater variation between intakes. There was no difference in the percentage of weight loss (2.1% vs. 2%, P=0.78). AL group also showed more vomiting (17.2% vs. 6.7%, P=0.02) and increased abdominal distension (43.8% vs. 22.2%, P=0.007). Only one newborn in the CGC group had hypoglycemia (P=1.00).
Conclusions:
CGC feedings allows constant intake with less risk for intolerance without increasing the possibility of hypoglycemia or weight loss.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Periodic Classification of the Elements
The Periodic Table
Ionic Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Chemical Formulas
Molecular Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Properties of Transition Metals

