Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

28.1K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

614
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
614
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

498
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
498
What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

15.3K
A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...
15.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CLEAR-AI: confounder-aware learning for equitable and accurate reasoning in AI for diagnosis.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

Multimodal artificial intelligence models for radiology.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Immersive VR for the Assessment of Spatial Skills in Adolescents: Performance, Gender Effects, and Links to Computational Thinking.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Extraction of distant recurrence sites for breast cancer patients from free-text clinical notes using large language models.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same author

Biomedical multimodal large language models: From model-centric development to clinically grounded evaluation and integration.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same author

EchoAtlas: A Conversational, Multi-View Vision-Language Foundation Model for Echocardiography Interpretation and Clinical Reasoning.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

Immune biomarkers, profiles, and responses: a vaccine ontology perspective.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
Same journal

A pragmatist approach to bridging tables and ontologies through LinkML and punning.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
Same journal

FAIR in practice: minimum metadata schema for bioinformatics analytics by machines.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
Same journal

Prenatal monitoring in primary health care: a design science research-based approach to FHIR interoperability.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
Same journal

From narrative evidence to computable knowledge: a decision-relevant corpus for medicinal herb-disease relationships.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
Same journal

BERTopic-driven term extraction from biomedical texts toward ontology population: evaluating vaccine ontology with Plotkin's vaccines corpus.

Journal of biomedical semantics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.6K

Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain.

Asan Agibetov1,2, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz3, Marta Ondrésik4,5

  • 1Italian National Research Council, Via De Marini 6, Genoa, 16149, Italy.

Journal of Biomedical Semantics
|February 10, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computational framework to test causal hypotheses in disease pathogenesis. The method uses hypothesis graphs and confidence measurements, aiding researchers in planning experiments and literature reviews.

Keywords:
Biomedical ontologyHypothesis testingIncomplete knowledgeNetwork analysisOntology mapings

More Related Videos

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.2K
A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
07:35

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.6K
Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.2K
A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
07:35

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Systems Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Understanding inflammatory disease pathogenesis requires analyzing causal relationships between contributing factors and outcomes.
  • Proving causal hypotheses in biology is challenging due to incomplete knowledge and evidence limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational framework for testing biological causality hypotheses.
  • To translate biological knowledge on causal relationships into a testable model.

Main Methods:

  • Constructing hypothesis graphs from formalized background knowledge on causality.
  • Calculating confidence in causality hypotheses via normalized weighted path computations.
  • Simulating evidence collection to assess hypothesis confidence.

Main Results:

  • The methodology proved robust to contradictory information during hypothesis graph construction.
  • Validated confidence measures closely aligned with expert subjective assessments.
  • The framework allows for hypothesis testing with varying depths of causal knowledge.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology provides a useful framework for hypothesis testing in biological research.
  • It aids researchers in literature review, experimental planning, and evidence acquisition prioritization.
  • The approach facilitates testing hypotheses based on causal dependencies in biological processes.