Related Experiment Videos
Two-year process evaluation of a pilot program to increase elementary children's physical activity during school
Collin A Webster1, R Glenn Weaver2, Cate A Egan3
1Department of Physical Education, University of South Carolina, 1300 Wheat Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.
Evaluation and Program Planning
|February 10, 2018
Summary
The Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES) intervention did not significantly increase movement integration in elementary classrooms. Teacher interviews revealed strengths and limitations, highlighting the need for interpersonal support for movement integration.
Area of Science:
- Education
- Kinesiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Integrating physical activity into elementary education is crucial for child development.
- The Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES) program aimed to increase movement integration (MI) in classrooms.
- Understanding implementation processes is key to successful educational interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the PACES intervention on movement integration in elementary classrooms.
- To assess changes in teachers' perceptions of movement integration.
- To examine the implementation processes of a 2-year pilot intervention program.
Main Methods:
- A pilot intervention program, PACES, was implemented in grades 1-3 across four elementary schools (3 intervention, 1 control).
- Data were collected over two academic years (Fall 2014-Spring 2016) from 12 teachers, decreasing to eight by the final year.
- Movement integration was measured using the System for Observing Student Movement in Academic Routines and Transitions (SOSMART), supplemented by teacher interviews.
Main Results:
- The PACES intervention did not significantly increase the extent of observed movement integration in classrooms.
- Teacher interviews indicated that the intervention had both positive aspects and challenges.
- Interpersonal support emerged as a critical factor for teachers' adoption of movement integration strategies.
Conclusions:
- The PACES intervention's impact on movement integration was not statistically significant.
- Effective implementation of movement integration requires robust interpersonal support systems for teachers.
- Future research may benefit from adjusted data collection schedules to better capture movement integration instances.