Skilled attendant at birth and newborn survival in Sub-Saharan Africa
Agbessi Amouzou1, Meng Ziqi2, Liliana Carvajal-Aguirre2
1Institute for International Programs, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Background:
Recent studies have shown higher neonatal mortality among births delivered by a skilled attendant at birth (SAB) compared to those who were not in sub-Saharan African countries. Deaths during the neonatal period are concentrated in the first 7 days of life, with about one third of these deaths occurring during the first day of life. We reassessed the relationship between SAB and neonatal mortality by distinguishing deaths on the first day of life from those on days 2-27.
Methods:
We used data on births in the past five years from recent demographic and health survey (DHS) between 2010 and 2014 in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The main categorical outcome was 1) newborns who died within the first day of birth (day 0-1), 2) newborns who died between days 2-27, and 3) newborns who survived the neonatal period. We ran generalized linear mixed model with multinomial distribution and random effect for country on pooled data. Additionally, we ran a separate model restricted to births with SAB and assessed the association of receipt of seven antenatal care (ANC) and two immediate postnatal care interventions on risk of death on days 0-1 and days 2-27. These variables were assessed as proxy of quality of antenatal and postnatal care.
Results:
We found no statistically significant difference in risk of death on first day of life between newborns with SAB compared to those without. However, after the first day of life, newborns delivered with SAB were 16% less likely to die within 2-27 days than those without SAB (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71-0.99). Among births with skilled attendant, those who were weighed at birth and those who were initiated early on breastfeeding were significantly less likely to die on days 0-1 (respectively OR = 0.42 95% CI = 0.29-0.62 and OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.18-0.31) or on days 2-27 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45-0.81 and OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 47-0.74, respectively). Newborns whose mothers received an additional ANC intervention had no improved survival chances during days 0-1 of life. However, there was significant association on days 2-27 where newborns whose mothers received an additional ANC interventions had higher survival chances (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98).
Conclusion:
Findings demonstrate the vulnerability of newborns immediately after birth, compounded with insufficient quality of care. Improving the quality of care around the time of birth will significantly improve survival and therefore accelerate reduction in neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries. Improved approaches for measuring skilled attendant at birth are also needed.
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...


