Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Echoic memory processes in good and poor readers.

S Sipe, R W Engle

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dissociable brain mechanisms for inhibitory control: effects of interference content and working memory capacity.

    Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2003
    Same author

    A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
    Same author

    Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration.

    Memory & cognition·2001
    Same author

    Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
    Same author

    The effect of memory load on negative priming: an individual differences investigation.

    Memory & cognition·1999
    Same author

    The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·1997
    Same journal

    Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    Poor readers exhibit deficits in echoic memory, impacting reading ability. This study found that poor readers have a reduced ability to retain auditory information over time compared to good readers.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Reading ability varies significantly among individuals.
    • Echoic memory, the brief auditory sensory memory, is crucial for processing sequential information.
    • Previous research has not fully elucidated the role of echoic memory in reading proficiency differences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between echoic memory and reading ability.
    • To determine if deficits in echoic memory contribute to differences between good and poor readers.
    • To examine the duration and stimulus specificity of echoic memory in different reading groups.

    Main Methods:

    • Four experiments were conducted using suffix procedures and auditory shadowing tasks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants included good and poor readers.
  • Stimuli included digits, words, and white noise bursts presented under varying conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Poor readers demonstrated a larger decrement in performance with auditory suffixes compared to good readers.
    • Poor readers exhibited a faster decline in recall accuracy for non-attended auditory stimuli as retention intervals increased.
    • No significant differences were found between good and poor readers in detecting brief bursts of white noise, suggesting speech-specific echoic memory differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Echoic memory deficits are associated with poor reading ability.
    • The duration of echoic memory appears to be shorter in poor readers.
    • These findings suggest that difficulties in processing and retaining auditory information contribute to reading impairments.