Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
Carotid Access for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Pathology: A Systematic Review
Thomas W Stonier1, Kirtan Patel2, Vamsee Bhrugubanda3
1SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical Collaborative; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Harlow, UK.
Insights
Carotid artery access is a viable alternative for endovascular repair of aortic disease when femoral access is not possible. This approach offers good short-term survival and low neurological complication rates.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Aortic Disease Management
Background:
- Endovascular repair is the preferred treatment for aortic diseases, typically accessed via the femoral artery.
- Not all patients are suitable candidates for femoral artery access.
- Alternative access routes are crucial for expanding endovascular treatment options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the current evidence on carotid artery access for endovascular aortic repair.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this alternative access route.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
- Searched 4 electronic databases for relevant case reports.
- Analyzed data from 11 case reports involving 12 patients.
Main Results:
- Included pathologies: thoracic/abdominal aneurysms, penetrating ulcers, endoleak, pseudoaneurysm.
- Contraindications for traditional access included poor patient fitness (83%) and severe iliac disease (75%).
- Reported 30-day mortality of 8.3% (1 death), with the same patient experiencing spinal ischemia; no strokes occurred.
Conclusions:
- Carotid artery access is a feasible alternative when traditional endovascular access is contraindicated and open repair is not an option.
- This approach demonstrates acceptable 30-day survival rates.
- Low rates of neurological complications, such as stroke and transient ischemic attack, were observed.
Background:
Endovascular repair is now preferred to open access for the management of aortic diseases. This is typically performed via the femoral artery; however, not all patients are eligible for this. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence for utilizing the carotid artery as an alternative access route.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using 4 electronic databases.
Results:
The search found 11 case reports representing 12 patients eligible for analysis (mean age 64.5 years). This included 3 thoracic aneurysms, 3 abdominal aneurysms, 4 penetrating ulcers, 1 endoleak, and 1 pseudoaneurysm. An open procedure was contraindicated in 83% (10/12) due to the poor physiological fitness of the patient. In 75% (9/12) of cases, traditional endovascular access was contraindicated by severe iliac disease. The remainder were contraindicated because of an existing ligated aortic stump (1/12, 8.3%) or technical difficulty with graft deployment via the femoral artery (2/12, 16.7%). There was 1 death, with the 30-day mortality 8.3%. The same patient suffered the only spinal ischemia before death (8.3%). There were no cases of stroke (0%), with one case of transient ischemic attack (8.3%).
Conclusions:
Although there is a relative paucity of literature, this study demonstrates when traditional endovascular access is impossible and an open procedure contraindicated, carotid artery access for endovascular repair of aortic pathology is a viable alternative with good 30-day survival and low rates of neurological sequelae.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair

