Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

498
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
498
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.4K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.4K
Average Acceleration01:30

Average Acceleration

14.6K
The importance of understanding acceleration spans our day-to-day experiences, as well as the vast reaches of outer space and the tiny world of subatomic physics. In everyday conversation, to accelerate means to speed up. For instance, we are familiar with the acceleration of our car; the harder we apply our foot to the gas pedal, the faster we accelerate. The greater the acceleration, the greater the change in velocity over a given time. Acceleration is widely seen in experimental physics. In...
14.6K
Average Velocity01:12

Average Velocity

24.4K
To calculate the other physical quantities in kinematics, we must introduce the time variable. The time variable allows us not only to state the position of the object during its motion, but also how fast it is moving. The speed at which an object is moving is given by the rate at which the position changes with time. For each position xi, we assign a particular time ti. If the details of the motion at each instant are not important, the rate is usually expressed as the average velocity. This...
24.4K
Average Value of a Function01:17

Average Value of a Function

70
The average value of a function over a closed interval can be interpreted geometrically as the height of a rectangle whose area equals the net area under the curve across that interval. This net area accounts for both positive and negative contributions of the function, providing a single representative value that reflects the function’s overall behaviorA practical illustration of this idea arises when monitoring the temperature inside a greenhouse over a twenty-four-hour period. Although...
70
Average Power01:13

Average Power

1.1K
In practical electrical applications, the concept of time-varying instantaneous power is not frequently utilized. Instead, focus shifts to the more practical quantity known as average power. Average power is determined by integrating the instantaneous power over a specified time period and subsequently dividing it by that duration.
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Formal responsibility and task execution: the importance of modelling task delegation in FRAM to optimise the identification of potential improvement strategies.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Uncovering gaps in workforce well-being: a national look at survey practice in Dutch university medical centres - an exploratory quantitative study.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Assessing variable importance in survival analysis using machine learning.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Towards sustainable water management for Galdieria sulphuraria cultivation.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and biological agents: the ARIA-ITALY survey.

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2024
Same author

Severe asthma: follow-up after one year from the Italian Registry on Severe Asthma (IRSA)

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Differential Imaging of Biological Structures with Doubly-resonant Coherent Anti-stokes Raman Scattering CARS
12:56

Differential Imaging of Biological Structures with Doubly-resonant Coherent Anti-stokes Raman Scattering CARS

Published on: October 17, 2010

14.1K

Doubly robust nonparametric inference on the average treatment effect.

D Benkeser1, M Carone2, M J Van Der Laan3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, U.S.A.benkeser@emory.edu.

Biometrika
|February 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Doubly robust estimators for treatment effects can fail when nuisance parameters are estimated flexibly. Targeted minimum loss-based estimation offers a robust solution for valid statistical inference in these challenging scenarios.

Keywords:
Adaptive estimationDoubly robust estimationEfficient influence functionTargeted minimum loss-based estimation

More Related Videos

Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3
11:10

Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3

Published on: December 27, 2010

12.8K
Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species
10:52

Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species

Published on: July 2, 2015

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Differential Imaging of Biological Structures with Doubly-resonant Coherent Anti-stokes Raman Scattering CARS
12:56

Differential Imaging of Biological Structures with Doubly-resonant Coherent Anti-stokes Raman Scattering CARS

Published on: October 17, 2010

14.1K
Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3
11:10

Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3

Published on: December 27, 2010

12.8K
Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species
10:52

Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species

Published on: July 2, 2015

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Doubly robust (DR) estimators are crucial for causal inference, providing consistent estimates of average treatment effects under weaker conditions.
  • Standard DR methods assume consistent estimation of nuisance parameters, which is often unmet with flexible, data-adaptive estimation techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the behavior of DR estimators when nuisance parameters are inconsistently estimated.
  • To identify and evaluate methods for achieving doubly robust inference in the presence of estimation challenges.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of DR estimator properties under misspecified nuisance parameters.
  • Comparison of different construction methods for DR estimators.
  • Numerical simulations to assess practical performance.

Main Results:

  • Targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) naturally extends to provide doubly robust inference even with inconsistent nuisance parameter estimation.
  • Common alternative frameworks for constructing DR estimators are often inappropriate for achieving robust inference in this setting.

Conclusions:

  • TMLE provides a viable and theoretically sound approach for robust causal effect estimation when nuisance parameters are estimated using flexible methods.
  • The findings have broad implications for developing robust statistical inference methods in various fields beyond treatment effect estimation.