Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Visualizing Single-Stranded DNA During DNA Repair for Therapeutic Insights
Published on: December 22, 2023
A drift-diffusion checkpoint model predicts a highly variable and growth-factor-sensitive portion of the cell cycle
Zack W Jones1, Rachel Leander1, Vito Quaranta2
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, United States of America.
Cell cycle progression shows high variability even in identical cells. A stochastic drift-diffusion+threshold model reveals that two checkpoints, particularly in G1 phase, explain this variability and sensitivity to growth factors.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Mathematical Modeling
- Systems Biology
Background:
- Intermitotic time (IMT), the duration of the cell cycle, exhibits significant variability even in genetically identical cells.
- Decades of research have proposed various mathematical models to explain this inherent cell cycle variability.
- Previous work established a stochastic drift-diffusion+threshold (DDT) model for cell cycle checkpoints, demonstrating its ability to fit experimental IMT distributions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply and extend the DDT modeling approach for descriptive and predictive analysis of cell cycle variability.
- To develop a robust numerical method for estimating model parameters without prior assumptions on the number of checkpoints.
- To identify the optimal number of checkpoints and their characteristics influencing IMT using diverse experimental data.
Main Methods:
- Development of a custom numerical method for maximum likelihood estimation of DDT model parameters.
- Fitting one-, two-, and three-checkpoint variants of the DDT model to IMT data from multiple cell lines under varying conditions (growth, drug treatments).
- Analysis of experimental data separating IMT into G1, S, G2, and M phases to correlate model predictions with specific cell cycle stages.
Main Results:
- A two-checkpoint DDT model provided the best fit to the experimental IMT data.
- The model identified distinct phases of the cell cycle: a highly variable, growth factor-sensitive phase and a less variable, growth factor-refractory phase.
- Experimental validation confirmed that the growth factor-sensitive phase corresponds to a portion of G1, aligning with the 'commitment to divide' concept.
Conclusions:
- The study validates a parsimonious two-checkpoint stochastic model for explaining cell cycle time variability.
- The G1 phase commitment step is identified as the primary driver of intermitotic time variability and growth factor sensitivity.
- This modeling approach offers fundamental insights into the biological mechanisms governing cell cycle progression and its variability.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Role of Hematopoietic Growth Factors
Thrombopoietin (TPO), mainly released by the liver,...
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: pH
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Instinctive Drift
Diffusion

