Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

06:59
A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
Published on: August 11, 2010
12.5K
Optimization of robustness of interdependent network controllability by redundant design
Zenghu Zhang1, Yongfeng Yin1, Xin Zhang1
1School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Plos One
|February 14, 2018
Summary
This study enhances the robustness of complex interdependent networks against failures. Strategies like node backup and edge redundancy improve controllability, with cost-effective methods like BBS, DBS, and HDF recommended for practical application.
Area of Science:
- Complex network theory
- Network science
- Systems engineering
Background:
- Interdependent networks are coupled systems susceptible to cascading failures.
- Controllability of these networks is crucial but often compromised by failures.
- Optimizing the robustness of interdependent network controllability is a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the cascading process in interdependent networks under node attacks.
- To measure and analyze the robustness of network controllability.
- To propose and evaluate strategies for optimizing controllability robustness.
Main Methods:
- Constructing a model of interdependent networks.
- Simulating cascading processes under varying proportions of node attacks.
- Measuring structural controllability using minimum driver nodes.
- Proposing a novel parameter to analyze robustness.
- Implementing and comparing redundant design strategies (node backup, edge backup) with cost considerations.
Main Results:
- Node backup and redundancy edge backup effectively reduce node failures and enhance controllability robustness.
- Specific strategies like Betweenness-Based Strategy (BBS) or Degree-Based Strategy (DBS) for node backup and High Degree First (HDF) for edge backup are identified as cost-effective.
- The proposed strategies demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness in improving network controllability.
Conclusions:
- Redundant design is a viable approach to bolster the controllability of interdependent complex networks.
- Tailoring backup strategies based on network structure and cost is essential for optimal robustness.
- The findings provide practical guidelines for enhancing the resilience of real-world complex systems.
Related Concept Videos
PD Controller: Design
669
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
669
PI Controller: Design
1.3K
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
1.3K
Protein Networks
4.6K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Group Design
10.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.8K
Network Covalent Solids
16.2K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
Optimal Foraging
14.0K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.0K

