Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
Published on: November 12, 2014
Factors predicting the success of trabeculectomy bleb enhancement with needling
Jonathan Y-X L Than1,2, Toby S Al-Mugheiry1, Jesse Gale3,4
1Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Background:
Bleb needling is widely used to restore flow and lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in a failing trabeculectomy. We aimed to measure the safety and efficacy of needling in a large cohort and identify factors that were associated with success and failure.
Methods:
This retrospective audit included all patients who underwent needling at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge over a 10-year period. Data were available on 91 patients (98% of patients identified), including 191 needlings on 96 eyes. Success was defined as IOP below 21 mm Hg or 16 mm Hg or 13 mm Hg consistently, without reoperation or glaucoma medication. Risk factors for failure were assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results:
Success defined as IOP <16 mm Hg was 66.6% at 12 months and 53% at 3 years and success defined as IOP <21 mm Hg was 77.1% at 12 months and 73.1% at 3 years. Failure after needling was most common in the first 6 months. Factors that predicted failure were flat or fibrotic blebs (non-functional) and no longer injected, while success was predicted by achieving a low IOP immediately after needling. No significant complications were identified.
Conclusion:
Needling was most successful soon after trabeculectomy, but resuscitation of a long-failed trabeculectomy had lower likelihood of success. The safety and efficacy compare favourably with alternative treatment approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Succession
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
Transcription Factors
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

