A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled study investigating the efficiency and safety of 3 different methods of rectus sheath block analgesia following midline laparotomy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Spectral Characterization of Physiological and Malperfused Tissues
Published on: July 5, 2024
Martin Purdy1, Mari Kinnunen, Merja Kokki
1Department of Surgery, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland Department of Anesthesia and Operative Services, Kuopio University Hospital Departments of Gynecology and Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio Admescope, Ltd, Oulu School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Background:
There is a controversy regarding the efficacy of rectus sheath block (RSB). The aim of the present study was to evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety of three different methods of RSB in postoperative pain management after midline laparotomy.
Methods:
A prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial with 4 parallel groups was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Finland. A total of 57 patients undergoing midline laparotomy were randomized to the control group (n = 12) or to 1 of the 3 active RSB analgesia groups: single-dose (n = 16), repeated-doses (n = 12), or continuous infusion (n = 17). Opioid consumption with iv-patient-controlled analgesia pump was recorded, and pain scores and patients' satisfaction were surveyed on an 11-point numeric rating scale for the first 48 postoperative h. Plasma concentrations of oxycodone and levobupivacaine were analyzed. All adverse events during the hospital stay were recorded.
Results:
Oxycodone consumption was less during the first 12 h in the repeated-doses and in the continuous infusion groups (P = .07) and in numerical values up to 48 h in the repeated-doses group. Plasma oxycodone concentrations were similar in all 4 groups. Pain scores were lower in the repeated-doses group when coughing during the first 4 h (P = .048 vs. control group), and at rest on the first postoperative morning (P = .034 vs. the other 3 groups) and at 24 h (P = .006 vs. the single-dose group). All plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine were safe. The patients' satisfaction was better in the repeated-doses group compared with the control group (P = .025). No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported.
Conclusions:
RSB analgesia with repeated-doses seems to have opioid sparing efficacy, and it may enhance pain relief and patients' satisfaction after midline laparotomy.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Random Sampling Method
Survey Safety
Birth Control Methods
Analgesia and Pain Management
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

