Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
Published on: May 31, 2018
Individual differences in the processing of referential dependencies: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Robert Fiorentino1, Lauren Covey2, Alison Gabriele3
1Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, Dole Human Development Center, Room 4037, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States.
This study on pronoun resolution found that working memory and attention influence how people process ambiguous sentences. Referential failure in sentences triggered a P600 brainwave response in all participants.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psycholinguistics
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- Referential ambiguity and failure pose challenges in language comprehension.
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer insights into real-time language processing.
- Individual differences in cognitive abilities may modulate responses to linguistic ambiguity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural processing of referential ambiguity and failure using ERPs.
- To explore the relationship between working memory, attentional control, and ERP responses to referential ambiguity.
- To examine how referential failure is processed neurally.
Main Methods:
- Participants read sentences with varying degrees of referential ambiguity (one, two, or no gender-matching antecedents).
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during sentence reading.
- Cognitive abilities were assessed using working memory (Count Span/Reading Span) and attentional control (Number Stroop) tasks.
Main Results:
- Two distinct ERP patterns (sustained negativity - Nref, and sustained positivity) emerged in response to referential ambiguity.
- Nref amplitude correlated positively with working memory capacity (Count Span).
- Positivity effects were marginally related to attentional control (Stroop performance).
- Referential failure consistently elicited a P600 ERP component across all participants.
Conclusions:
- Individual cognitive abilities, specifically working memory and attentional control, differentially modulate neural responses to referential ambiguity.
- The P600 response to referential failure suggests it is treated as a grammatical violation, irrespective of explicit judgment.
- ERPs provide a valuable tool for dissecting the cognitive mechanisms underlying language comprehension and individual differences.
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
The Evidence for Evolution
Standard Electrode Potentials
Impact of Individuals on Individuals
Frequency-dependent Selection
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

