Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions03:11

Oxidation-Reduction Reactions

75.9K
Oxidation–Reduction Reactions
75.9K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital self-management programme for pain, fatigue and faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open gastroenterology·2026
Same author

An Idealized Model of Extrusome Ejection Through the Collapse of a Capsule.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

Supporting patients using a digital self-management intervention for symptoms of fatigue, pain, and urgency/incontinence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a mixed methods process evaluation of trial facilitators.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Complementary role of humanitarian civil society organisations in bridging gaps in immunisation programming in conflict and crisis-affected settings: the REACH Project experience.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

Expert consensus on optimal goal-setting practices for caregivers of children with a disability or delay: an international Delphi consensus study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Direct access CT coronary angiography in patients referred with suspected cardiac chest pain: a novel patient pathway.

Open heart·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Sigma's Non-specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate
11:37

Sigma's Non-specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate

Published on: September 17, 2008

78.7K

Reduction in Chemotherapy Mixing Errors Using Six Sigma: Illinois CancerCare Experience.

Bridgette Heard1, Laura Miller1, Pankaj Kumar1

  • 1Illinois CancerCare, Peoria, IL.

Journal of Oncology Practice
|February 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Six Sigma methods significantly reduced chemotherapy mixing errors (CTMRs) by 100-fold, decreasing patient impact and saving costs. This quality improvement initiative enhanced patient safety in cancer care.

More Related Videos

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
07:42

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity

Published on: April 26, 2012

18.6K
Modeling Chemotherapy Resistant Leukemia In Vitro
08:41

Modeling Chemotherapy Resistant Leukemia In Vitro

Published on: February 9, 2016

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Sigma's Non-specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate
11:37

Sigma's Non-specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate

Published on: September 17, 2008

78.7K
Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
07:42

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity

Published on: April 26, 2012

18.6K
Modeling Chemotherapy Resistant Leukemia In Vitro
08:41

Modeling Chemotherapy Resistant Leukemia In Vitro

Published on: February 9, 2016

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Chemotherapy mixing errors (CTMRs) pose significant risks in oncology practice.
  • Large cancer centers with multiple satellite locations face unique challenges in maintaining consistency.
  • Standardization of processes is crucial for patient safety in chemotherapy administration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and evaluate the effectiveness of Six Sigma methodology in reducing CTMRs.
  • To improve the quality and safety of chemotherapy preparation and administration.
  • To identify and address root causes of CTMRs within a large oncology practice.

Main Methods:

  • A Six Sigma team, including nurses and pharmacy technicians, received DMAIC process training.
  • Error data was collected through retrospective tracking, system audits, and staff surveys.
  • Interventions included developing checklists, enhancing education, and implementing competency testing.

Main Results:

  • The Six Sigma project reduced the CTMR rate from 0.050% to 0.019%, a 100-fold improvement (Sigma from 4.2 to 5.2).
  • The proportion of errors affecting patients decreased from 77% to 15%.
  • Annualized financial losses due to errors were reduced from $11,537.95 to $1,262.40.

Conclusions:

  • Six Sigma is a highly effective methodology for reducing CTMRs in clinical practice.
  • The implemented interventions successfully improved patient safety and operational efficiency.
  • Continuous quality improvement processes are vital for minimizing medication errors in cancer care.