Comparison of ultrasonographic transurethral and laparoscopic guided oocytes retrieval

Fifty-eight patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment were divided into two groups. In 28 patients, ultrasonically guided transurethral follicular aspiration was performed under light general anesthesia. In 30 patients, laparoscopic follicular aspiration was performed under general anesthesia. The mean age for both groups was similar. Follicular recruitment was achieved with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or a combination of clomiphene citrate and hMG. In the ultrasonically guided aspiration group, 128 follicles were aspirated, with a 64% recovery rate (83 oocytes) and an 88.1% embryo transfer (ET) rate (67 embryos). Three (10.7%) intrauterine pregnancies were established in this group. In the laparoscopic group, 153 follicles were aspirated, with a 68.6% recovery rate (105 oocytes) and an 86.3% ET rate (82 embryos), with 4 (13.3%) intrauterine pregnancies established. Three patients had both procedures done; however, none conceived. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Ultrasonically guided transurethral follicular aspiration should be considered as an alternative route for oocyte retrieval, especially when laparoscopy is contraindicated or when the ovaries are not accessible.