Pleural drainage using drainage bag for thoracoscopic lobectomy

Objective This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and convenience of a drainage bag and a chest bottle following thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods We conducted a test to ensure that the drainage bag was characterized by easy drainage and an antireflux effect. Thereafter, the drainage bag was used in all thoracic operations in our service. To understand the usefulness of the drainage bag, a retrospective cohort study enrolled 30 patients who had a drainage bag after thoracoscopic lobectomy and compared them with 30 similar patients operated on previously who had chest bottles. Variables studied included total drainage volume, duration of drainage, complications, and satisfaction of the care providers. Results There was no significant difference between the chest bottle and drainage bag groups respectively in terms of total drainage (697.5 ± 89.7 vs. 614.1 ± 76.6 mL, p = 0.483) or duration of drainage (4.23 ± 0.38 vs. 4.43 ± 0.38 days, p = 0.713). No device-related complication was observed. After our experience with the drainage bag, we abandoned use of the chest bottle. The drainage bag was more convenient for patients and promoted early ambulation as well improving cost effectiveness. Most care providers preferred to use the drainage bag (p = 0.000). Conclusion The drainage bag is superior to the chest bottle for postoperative drainage.