Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the 'panacea' for all

Alessandro Morabito1

  • 1The Medical Oncology Unit, Thoracic-Pulmonary Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semola, 80131, Naples, Italy. a.morabito@istitutotumori.na.it.

BMC Medicine
|February 17, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Second-line immunotherapy shows promise for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without actionable mutations. However, predictive biomarkers are crucial for identifying patients who will benefit from these novel treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Biomarkers

Background:

  • Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved with new drugs like nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and afatinib.
  • A network meta-analysis by Créquit et al. compared second-line treatments for NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR status.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC.
  • To highlight the importance of predictive biomarkers in guiding treatment decisions for immunotherapy.

Main Methods:

  • Network meta-analysis comparing various second-line therapies for advanced NSCLC.
  • Analysis focused on patients with wild-type or unknown epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status.

Main Results:

  • Immunotherapy may be more effective than currently recommended treatments for advanced NSCLC.
  • The meta-analysis did not account for predictive biomarkers, which are essential for patient selection.

Conclusions:

  • Identifying molecular biomarkers is critical to maximize the benefits of immune checkpoint, angiogenesis, and EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC.
  • Biomarker research is needed to aid clinicians in selecting optimal second-line therapies for advanced NSCLC patients.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...