Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain)
Sarah G Dean1, Leon Poltawski1, Anne Forster2
1University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Objectives:
To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity.
Design:
A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations.
Setting:
Community settings across two sites in Devon.
Participants:
Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation.
Interventions:
ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet.
Outcome Measures:
Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity.
Results:
Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations.
Conclusions:
All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT02429180; Results.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
What are Populations and Communities?
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview

