Sex Differences in Ischemic Heart Disease: Advances, Obstacles, and Next Steps
Niti R Aggarwal1, Hena N Patel2, Laxmi S Mehta2
1From Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Radiology, the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison (N.R.A.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (H.N.P., R.M.S., A.S.V.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus (L.S.M.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (G.P.L.); Division of Cardiology, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR (S.J.L.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (M.A.M.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (M.J.W.); and Department of Cardiology, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York (J.H.M.). aggarwal@medicine.wisc.edu.
Ischemic heart disease remains a leading cause of death for women, with disparities linked to underrepresentation in research. Addressing sex-specific factors is crucial for improving cardiovascular outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Women's Health
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in US women.
- Despite advances, significant disparities in IHD burden persist among women, particularly those from disadvantaged social groups.
- Underrepresentation of women in research contributes to unfavorable impacts on IHD diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize contemporary trends in women's IHD.
- To characterize current sex-specific outcome disparities.
- To propose solutions for improving IHD clinical care and research in women.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on sex-specific IHD.
- Analysis of disparities based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education.
- Identification of challenges and proposed strategies for improvement.
Main Results:
- Knowledge of sex-specific IHD factors has improved outcomes, yet disparities remain.
- Multifactorial causes of disparities include risk factor prevalence, healthcare access, and social determinants.
- Lack of awareness and knowledge gaps regarding sex-specific IHD further exacerbate outcome differences.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for sex- and gender-specific strategies to enhance cardiovascular outcomes in women.
- Addressing disparities requires a comprehensive approach targeting research, clinical care, and public awareness.
- Implementing tailored interventions is essential for improving the full spectrum of IHD care for women.
More Related Videos
05:06Model of Ischemic Heart Disease and Video-Based Comparison of Cardiomyocyte Contraction Using hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Published on: May 5, 2020
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Sex-linked Disorders
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
