Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Relative Velocity in One Dimension01:10

Relative Velocity in One Dimension

11.0K
The understanding of the concept of reference frames is essential to discuss relative motion in one or more dimensions. When we say that an object has a certain velocity, we must state the velocity with respect to a given reference frame. In most examples, this reference frame has been Earth. For instance, if a statement reads that a person is sitting in a train moving at 10 m/s east, then it implies that the person on the train is moving relative to the surface of Earth at this velocity,...
11.0K
Relative Frequency Histogram01:14

Relative Frequency Histogram

6.5K
The relative frequency depicts the proportion of data points that have each value. The frequency tells the number of data points that have each value. Like the histogram, a relative frequency histogram also has the same shape with a horizontal scale (the x-axis), but the vertical scale (the y-axis) is marked with relative frequencies (percentages of the whole) instead of actual frequencies. A relative frequency histogram is a graphical representation of a frequency distribution where the...
6.5K
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions01:11

Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions

9.2K
Relative velocity is the velocity of an object as observed from a particular reference frame, or the velocity of one reference frame with respect to another reference frame. The concept of relative velocity can be used to describe motion in two dimensions. Consider a particle P and two reference frames S and S′. The position of the origin of S′ as measured in S is , the position of P as measured in S′ is , and the position of P as measured in S is , which can be evaluated by utilizing...
9.2K
Relative Frequency Distribution00:55

Relative Frequency Distribution

13.8K
A relative frequency distribution is the proportion or fraction of times a value occurs in a data set. To find the relative frequencies, one can divide each frequency by the total number of data points in the sample. It is very similar to a regular frequency distribution, except that instead of reporting how many data values fall in a class, a relative frequency distribution reports the fraction of data values that fall in a class. These fractions or proportions are called relative frequencies...
13.8K
Relative Stabilities of Alkenes01:59

Relative Stabilities of Alkenes

15.9K
The relative stability of alkenes can be determined by comparing their heats of hydrogenation. The lower heat of hydrogenation indicates the more stable alkene.  The three main factors determining the relative stability of alkenes are i) the number of substituents attached to the double-bond carbon atoms, ii) hyperconjugation, and iii) the stereochemistry of the double bond.
15.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of a Novel Case-Based Session for Medical Students Focused on Artificial Intelligence Ethics.

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources·2026
Same author

A Survey of Ethics Review Committees in New York State Hospitals: Key Findings and Lessons.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same author

Dialogic Engagement and the Epistemic Norms of Bioethics Mediation.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2025
Same author

Revisiting "Fellowship-Trained": Toward Shared Meaning in Clinical Ethics.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

The Futility Standard Does Not Promote Justice for Unrepresented Patients.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Consultation-Liaison Case Conference: Treatment Over Objection in the General Hospital.

Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry·2025
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits
11:09

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits

Published on: October 12, 2015

19.8K

It's All Relative.

Adira Hulkower, Lauren S Flicker

    The Hastings Center Report
    |February 20, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinicians should not be overly deferential to surrogate decision-makers, as their value is limited to patient preferences. A relational approach, however, recognizes surrogates

    More Related Videos

    Measuring Relative Insulin Secretion using a Co-Secreted Luciferase Surrogate
    05:58

    Measuring Relative Insulin Secretion using a Co-Secreted Luciferase Surrogate

    Published on: June 25, 2019

    8.0K
    Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
    11:12

    Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves

    Published on: October 17, 2013

    14.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

    Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits
    11:09

    Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits

    Published on: October 12, 2015

    19.8K
    Measuring Relative Insulin Secretion using a Co-Secreted Luciferase Surrogate
    05:58

    Measuring Relative Insulin Secretion using a Co-Secreted Luciferase Surrogate

    Published on: June 25, 2019

    8.0K
    Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
    11:12

    Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves

    Published on: October 17, 2013

    14.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical Ethics
    • Clinical Decision-Making

    Background:

    • Clinicians often exhibit excessive deference to surrogate decision-makers.
    • This deference may stem from an inappropriate attribution of moral authority to surrogates.
    • Existing frameworks may not fully capture the surrogate's role and value.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine the moral authority and value of surrogate decision-makers in clinical settings.
    • To propose an alternative framework for understanding the surrogate's role in patient care.
    • To explore the implications of different ethical models for clinical practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical concepts related to surrogate decision-making.
    • Critique of existing bioethical frameworks concerning patient representation.
    • Discussion of the relational aspects of clinical encounters and decision-making.

    Main Results:

    • Surrogate decision-makers possess no inherent moral right to decide for patients.
    • The value of surrogates is primarily derived from their knowledge of the patient's preferences.
    • Brudney's framework could lead to increased paternalism and surrogate removal.
    • A relational perspective highlights the intrinsic value of surrogates due to their connection with the patient.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinicians should re-evaluate their deference to surrogates, focusing on their informational role.
    • A patient-centered approach acknowledges the surrogate's value stemming from the patient's claim to be represented by a loved one.
    • Bioethics consultation can help navigate complex patient-surroundings and conflicting values in clinical decision-making.