Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026
Ultrahigh Resolution Mouse Optical Coherence Tomography to Aid Intraocular Injection in Retinal Gene Therapy Research
Published on: November 2, 2018
Distinguishing Keratoconic Eyes and Healthy Eyes Using Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography-Based
Niklas Pircher1, Florian Schwarzhans1, Stephan Holzer1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Purpose:
To find differences in epithelial thickness (ET) maps of eyes with keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.
Design:
Institutional cross-sectional study.
Methods:
In this study 40 keratoconic eyes and 76 healthy eyes were scanned using a custom-built ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography system. Automated segmentation ET maps with 17 subsectors were calculated (central, temporal inferior, temporal superior, nasal inferior, and nasal superior area). The thinnest point of the epithelium (minET), the thickest point of the epithelium (maxET), and the thinnest point diagonally opposing the thickest point (ETmax/op) were additional parameters. Ratios were calculated as follows: minET/diagonally opposing point (R1), maxET/diagonally opposing point (R2), inferior temporal area/superior nasal area (RTI/NS), and inferior/superior hemisphere (RI/S). Furthermore, collected parameters were analyzed regarding their diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve; AUC).
Results:
Statistically significant differences were as follows: central ET, 46.25 ± 2.56/50.91 ± 1.66; minET, 38.50 ± 2.10/46.79 ± 1.27; ETmax/op, 47.14 ± 2.45/49.60 ± 1.57; temporal inferior area: 43.93 ± 2.95/51.04 ± 1.51 (all mean ± standard deviation, μm); R1, 0.76 ± 0.09/0.93 ± 0.04; R2, 1.08 ± 0.04/1.21 ± 0.16; RTI/NS, 0.85 ± 0.08/1.02 ± 0.04; RI/S: 0.92 ± 0.07/0.99 ± 0.02. AUC values were R1: 0.979 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.957-1.000), RTI/NS: 0.977 (CI: 0.951-1.000), and minET: 0.928 (CI: 0.880-0.977).
Conclusions:
Epithelial thickness maps could clearly visualize different ET patterns. Parameters with the highest potential of diagnostic discrimination between eyes with KC and healthy eyes were, in descending order, R1, RTI/NS, and minET. Consequently, epithelial thickness irregularity and asymmetry seem to be the most promising diagnostic factor in terms of discriminating between keratoconic eyes and healthy eyes.
More Related Videos
09:20Novel Photoacoustic Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography Dual-modality Chorioretinal Imaging in Living Rabbit Eyes
Published on: February 8, 2018
07:51Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
Related Concept Videos
01:20Muscles of the Eye
Extraocular Muscles
The six extraocular muscles surround the eyeball and control its movements. They are responsible for a wide range of eye motions, including looking up, down, left, right, and...
01:17Accessory Structures of the Eye
01:16Focusing of Light in the Eye
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:23Design Example: Deciding Thickness of Lubricating Fluid in a Shaft
To calculate the required thickness of the lubricant layer, the tangential velocity at the shaft's surface must first be determined. This velocity is calculated by converting the rotational speed to angular velocity...
01:30Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Simple Epithelium
Because of the thinness of the cells, simple squamous epithelium is present where the rapid passage of chemical compounds is observed. For example, the endothelium that lines the capillaries and vessels...