Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Elements of Block Diagrams01:25

Elements of Block Diagrams

732
Block diagrams serve as a visual representation of the input-output relationships within a system. An illustrative example is a heating system, where the set temperature activates the furnace to warm the room to the desired level. Block diagrams are versatile, modeling linear systems through Laplace transform variables and nonlinear systems using time domain variables.
A block diagram typically includes essential elements such as comparators, blocks, and feedback loops. Each of these elements...
732
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in visceral adiposity, body composition, and cardiometabolic profiles following a supervised mixed exercise program in women with normal-weight obesity and obesity.

BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Morphine and hydromorphone pharmacodynamics in human volunteers: sensitivity to benefit-harm thresholds. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1459-71.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Resolving the trifecta of discrepancies regarding the phosphorus suboxide P<sub>4</sub>O.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Enhancing Node-RADS for preoperative assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a focused question on patient-level decision-making.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Continuous posterior extrathoracic fascial plane block versus continuous paravertebral block for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures: possible influence of fracture location on analgesic efficacy. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 136:677-86.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Concordant Mode Approach (CMA): Vibrational Analysis of New and Upgraded Intermolecular Benchmarks for Noncovalent Bonding.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components
07:36

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components

Published on: February 1, 2017

10.0K

Spin-Orbit Coupling via Four-Component Multireference Methods: Benchmarking on p-Block Elements and Tentative

Boyi Zhang1, Jonathon E Vandezande1, Ryan D Reynolds2

  • 1Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry , University of Georgia , Athens , Georgia 30602 , United States.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|February 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Fully relativistic four-component (4c) methods accurately compute spin-orbit splittings for p-block elements. These electronic structure calculations provide reliable benchmarks for assessing computational chemistry methods.

More Related Videos

A Method to Preserve Wetland Roots and Rhizospheres for Elemental Imaging
06:29

A Method to Preserve Wetland Roots and Rhizospheres for Elemental Imaging

Published on: February 15, 2021

4.0K
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components
07:36

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components

Published on: February 1, 2017

10.0K
A Method to Preserve Wetland Roots and Rhizospheres for Elemental Imaging
06:29

A Method to Preserve Wetland Roots and Rhizospheres for Elemental Imaging

Published on: February 15, 2021

4.0K
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Quantum chemistry
  • Electronic structure theory

Background:

  • Fully relativistic four-component (4c) methods rigorously incorporate spin-orbit coupling.
  • Spin-orbit splittings serve as crucial benchmarks for evaluating the accuracy of these advanced computational methods.
  • Previous studies have not extensively explored spin-orbit splittings for p-block elements using 4c approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compute and assess spin-orbit splittings for p-block elements (Boron to Iodine) using various 4c electronic structure methods.
  • To evaluate the performance of 4c-CASSCF, 4c-CASPT2, and 4c-MR-CISD+Q methods against experimental data.
  • To investigate the impact of basis set size on the accuracy of computed spin-orbit splittings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized fully relativistic four-component (4c) methods based on the Dirac Hamiltonian.
  • Employed 4c-CASSCF, 4c-CASPT2, and 4c-MR-CISD+Q computational chemistry techniques.
  • Performed calculations using uncontracted Dunning basis sets and the BAGEL software package.

Main Results:

  • Most computed spin-orbit splittings were within 15% of experimental values, indicating good accuracy.
  • Accurate splittings for light elements (B-F) require large basis sets, while heavier elements show less basis dependence.
  • The 4c-MR-CISD+Q method excelled for light elements, 4c-CASSCF for heavier elements, and 4c-CASPT2 for group 13 atoms.

Conclusions:

  • Four-component relativistic methods provide accurate spin-orbit splittings for p-block elements.
  • Basis set convergence is critical for light elements but less so for heavier elements.
  • Specific 4c methods demonstrate varying strengths for different element groups, offering valuable insights for computational chemists.