Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro
Published on: September 18, 2017
Evaluation of comparative effectiveness research: a practical tool
Debra A Schaumberg1, Laura McDonald2, Surbhi Shah1
1Real-World Evidence, Evidera, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Abstract:
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) guidelines have been developed to direct the field toward the most rigorous study methodologies. A challenge, however, is how to ensure the best evidence is generated, and how to translate methodologically complex or nuanced CER findings into usable medical evidence. To reach that goal, it is important that both researchers and end users of CER output become knowledgeable about the elements that impact the quality and interpretability of CER. This paper distilled guidance on CER into a practical tool to assist both researchers and nonexperts with the critical review and interpretation of CER, with a focus on issues particularly relevant to CER in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The...
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

