Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Intensive remote monitoring versus conventional care in type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
Laura Gandrud1, Aylin Altan2, Paul Buzinec3
1Children's Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Insights
Intensive remote therapy (IRT) improved glycemic control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adolescents showed greater benefits but struggled to maintain them post-intervention.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Digital Health Interventions
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Frequent diabetes care provider contact can improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D).
- In-person visits for T1D management are resource-intensive and costly.
- Novel remote therapy approaches are needed to optimize pediatric T1D care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of an intensive remote therapy (IRT) intervention on pediatric patients with T1D.
- To assess changes in glycemic control (HbA1c) and diabetes-related quality of life (QoL).
- To compare IRT with conventional care (CC) in a randomized controlled trial.
Main Methods:
- Pediatric T1D patients were randomized to IRT or CC for 6 months.
- Both groups attended quarterly clinic visits and uploaded device data.
- IRT involved remote data review and patient contact for regimen adjustments.
Main Results:
- The IRT group showed a trend towards greater HbA1c reduction (-0.34% vs -0.05%, P=.071) overall.
- Adolescents (13-17 years) in the IRT group experienced a significant HbA1c decrease (-0.50% vs -0.06%, P=.056).
- Diabetes-related QoL improved more in the IRT group (6.5 vs 1.3 points, P=.062).
Conclusions:
- Intensive remote therapy (IRT) positively impacted diabetes metrics and QoL in pediatric T1D patients.
- Adolescents demonstrated a more pronounced treatment effect from IRT.
- Sustaining glycemic control improvements after IRT cessation was challenging for adolescents.
Objective:
While frequent contact with diabetes care providers may improve glycemic control among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), in-person visits are labor-intensive and costly. This study was conducted to assess the impact of an intensive remote therapy (IRT) intervention for pediatric patients with T1D.
Methods:
Pediatric patients with T1D were randomized to IRT or conventional care (CC) for 6 months. Both cohorts continued routine quarterly clinic visits and uploaded device data; for the IRT cohort, data were reviewed and patients were contacted if regimen adjustments were indicated. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline was assessed at 6 and 9 months. Diabetes-related quality of life (QoL), healthcare services utilization, and hypoglycemic events were also tracked.
Results:
Among 117 enrollees (60 IRT, 57 CC), mean (SD) 6-month %HbA1c change for IRT vs CC was -0.34 (0.85) (-3.7 mmol/mol) vs -0.05 (0.74) (-0.5 mmol/mol) overall (P = .071); -0.15 (0.67) (1.6 mmol/mol) vs -0.02 (0.66) (0.2 mmol/mol) for ages 8 to 12 (P = .541); and -0.50 (0.95) (-5.5 mmol/mol) vs -0.06 (0.80) (-0.7 mmol/mol) for ages 13 to 17 (P = .056). Diabetes-related QoL increased by 6.5 and 1.3 points for IRT and CC, respectively (P = .062). Three months after intervention cessation, %HbA1c changed minimally among treated children aged 8 to 12 but increased by 0.22 (0.89) (2.4 mmol/mol) among those aged 13 to 17.
Conclusions:
IRT substantially affected diabetes metrics and improved QoL among pediatric patients with T1D. Adolescents experienced a stronger treatment effect, but had difficulty in sustaining improved control after intervention cessation.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview

